Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises

The European Union continuously faces transboundary crises (TBCs), such as the 1996 and 2000 outbreaks of ‘mad cow disease’, or the 2015 refugee crisis. Within this context, European Union agencies (EAs) have emerged as technical repositories that are capable of addressing such crises more efficient...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Jordana, Jacint, Pérez Durán, Ixchel, Triviño Salazar, Juan Carlos
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Data de publicação:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositório:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/59596
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:EU agencies
Management boards
Transboundary crises
Decision-making
Coordination
id ES_34d7e36bff3c95885172cb8f15fcd5a7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/59596
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crisesJordana, JacintPérez Durán, IxchelTriviño Salazar, Juan CarlosEU agenciesManagement boardsTransboundary crisesDecision-makingCoordinationThe European Union continuously faces transboundary crises (TBCs), such as the 1996 and 2000 outbreaks of ‘mad cow disease’, or the 2015 refugee crisis. Within this context, European Union agencies (EAs) have emerged as technical repositories that are capable of addressing such crises more efficiently than intergovernmental cooperation. However, their effective implication in transboundary crisis management largely varies, as different degrees of involvement can be observed. Different angles can be adopted to make sense of variation in the response of agencies to TBCs; hence, this study focuses on the role of EA management boards. These boards epitomize the unique nature of EU institutions, in that they represent the Member States and integrate their network capabilities into a single entity. Our study assesses perceptions of board members concerning three aspects related to the capacity of agencies to respond to TBCs: decision-making, coordination, and resources, based on a survey distributed among board members and a biographical database.This study was supported by the TransCrisis project (Grant No. 649484) under the European Union Horizon 2020 programme. The authors would like to thank the participants of the panel S31-06: Legitimacy, effectiveness and accountability of regional and global governance institutions at the 11th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, the participants of panel 144: Transformations in the Public Policy Process of the European Union at the 24th International Conference of Europeanists and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on previous versions of this manuscript.Springer202420242021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/59596http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésComparative European Politics. 2021;19(1):26-48.info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/649484This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/595962026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
title Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
spellingShingle Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
Jordana, Jacint
EU agencies
Management boards
Transboundary crises
Decision-making
Coordination
title_short Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
title_full Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
title_fullStr Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
title_sort Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jordana, Jacint
Pérez Durán, Ixchel
Triviño Salazar, Juan Carlos
author Jordana, Jacint
author_facet Jordana, Jacint
Pérez Durán, Ixchel
Triviño Salazar, Juan Carlos
author_role author
author2 Pérez Durán, Ixchel
Triviño Salazar, Juan Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EU agencies
Management boards
Transboundary crises
Decision-making
Coordination
topic EU agencies
Management boards
Transboundary crises
Decision-making
Coordination
description The European Union continuously faces transboundary crises (TBCs), such as the 1996 and 2000 outbreaks of ‘mad cow disease’, or the 2015 refugee crisis. Within this context, European Union agencies (EAs) have emerged as technical repositories that are capable of addressing such crises more efficiently than intergovernmental cooperation. However, their effective implication in transboundary crisis management largely varies, as different degrees of involvement can be observed. Different angles can be adopted to make sense of variation in the response of agencies to TBCs; hence, this study focuses on the role of EA management boards. These boards epitomize the unique nature of EU institutions, in that they represent the Member States and integrate their network capabilities into a single entity. Our study assesses perceptions of board members concerning three aspects related to the capacity of agencies to respond to TBCs: decision-making, coordination, and resources, based on a survey distributed among board members and a biographical database.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Comparative European Politics. 2021;19(1):26-48.
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/649484
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405843399639040
score 15.198674

Registros relacionados