Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor

To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic r...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Avalos-Durán, Georgina, Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del, Rivero-Murillo, Juana, Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc, Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza, Checa, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:190786
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/190786
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180027
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:PICSI
Physiological ICSI
Hyaluronic acid
HA sperm selection
Male factor
id ES_30357f4136c51de4cc7fe268bd917e8f
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:190786
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male FactorA Systematic ReviewAvalos-Durán, GeorginaÁngel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-DelRivero-Murillo, JuanaZambrano-Guerrero, Jaime EnocCarballo-Mondragón, EsperanzaCheca, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416PICSIPhysiological ICSIHyaluronic acidHA sperm selectionMale factorTo determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor. 22018-01-0120182018-01-01Article de revisióhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcVoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/190786https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180027reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució, la comunicació pública de l'obra i la creació d'obres derivades, fins i tot amb finalitats comercials, sempre i quan es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:1907862026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
A Systematic Review
title Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
spellingShingle Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
Avalos-Durán, Georgina
PICSI
Physiological ICSI
Hyaluronic acid
HA sperm selection
Male factor
title_short Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
title_full Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
title_fullStr Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
title_full_unstemmed Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
title_sort Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Avalos-Durán, Georgina
Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del
Rivero-Murillo, Juana
Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc
Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza
Checa, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416
author Avalos-Durán, Georgina
author_facet Avalos-Durán, Georgina
Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del
Rivero-Murillo, Juana
Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc
Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza
Checa, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416
author_role author
author2 Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del
Rivero-Murillo, Juana
Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc
Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza
Checa, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PICSI
Physiological ICSI
Hyaluronic acid
HA sperm selection
Male factor
topic PICSI
Physiological ICSI
Hyaluronic acid
HA sperm selection
Male factor
description To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2018-01-01
2018
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article de revisió
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/190786
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180027
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/190786
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180027
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405530092470272
score 15,198674

Registos relacionados