Entre el constitucional y el convencional: un estudio de las fuentes jurídicas del Estado colombiano a partir de la sanción de inhabilidad
The recent development of the concept of 'conventionality control' in the precedent case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights generates a transmutation of the sources of law and a translation of the principle of constitutional supremacy in the national legal orders. This has ind...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/19076 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19076 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dret constitucional -- Colòmbia Drets humans -- Colòmbia Constitutional law -- Colombia Human rights -- Colombia |
| Sumario: | The recent development of the concept of 'conventionality control' in the precedent case law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights generates a transmutation of the sources of law and a translation of the principle of constitutional supremacy in the national legal orders. This has induced an important discussion about constitutional dogmatic which has had a tremendous influence on the understanding of law in the Colombian legal system. Based on these reasons, the main objective of this research was to establish appropriate criteria of interpretation to allow solving regulatory differences between the American Convention on Human Rights and Political Constitution of Colombia, and in this manner achieve a harmonic interpretation of both. From this perspective, this research determines how the sources of law in Colombian legal system work based on the study of the inability sanction-particular case where both legal sources collide |
|---|