Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?

[EN]Long before experimental psychology, religious writers, orators, and playwrights described examples of lie detection based on the verbal content of statements. Legal scholars collected evidence from individual cases and systematized them as “rules of evidence”. Some of these resemble content cue...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Sporer, Siegfried L., Masip Pallejá, Jaume
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositório:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/153162
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/153162
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:History
Deception detection
Verbal cues
Verbal content cues
Content
Field study
Perjury cases
Deception cues
6114 Psicología social
6114.09 Psicología Forense
id ES_239d8ea71edd4c93bf04b048551dc7ba
oai_identifier_str oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/153162
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?Sporer, Siegfried L.Masip Pallejá, JaumeHistoryDeception detectionVerbal cuesVerbal content cuesContentField studyPerjury casesDeception cues6114 Psicología social6114.09 Psicología Forense[EN]Long before experimental psychology, religious writers, orators, and playwrights described examples of lie detection based on the verbal content of statements. Legal scholars collected evidence from individual cases and systematized them as “rules of evidence”. Some of these resemble content cues used in contemporary research, while others point to working hypotheses worth exploring. To examine their potential validity, we re-analyzed data from a quasi-experimental study of 95 perjury cases. The outcomes support the fruitfulness of this approach. Travelling back in time searching for testable ideas about content cues to truth and deception may be worthwhile.202320232023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/153162reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamancainstname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)InglésAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1531622026-06-07T06:28:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
title Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
spellingShingle Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
Sporer, Siegfried L.
History
Deception detection
Verbal cues
Verbal content cues
Content
Field study
Perjury cases
Deception cues
6114 Psicología social
6114.09 Psicología Forense
title_short Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
title_full Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
title_fullStr Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
title_full_unstemmed Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
title_sort Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sporer, Siegfried L.
Masip Pallejá, Jaume
author Sporer, Siegfried L.
author_facet Sporer, Siegfried L.
Masip Pallejá, Jaume
author_role author
author2 Masip Pallejá, Jaume
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv History
Deception detection
Verbal cues
Verbal content cues
Content
Field study
Perjury cases
Deception cues
6114 Psicología social
6114.09 Psicología Forense
topic History
Deception detection
Verbal cues
Verbal content cues
Content
Field study
Perjury cases
Deception cues
6114 Psicología social
6114.09 Psicología Forense
description [EN]Long before experimental psychology, religious writers, orators, and playwrights described examples of lie detection based on the verbal content of statements. Legal scholars collected evidence from individual cases and systematized them as “rules of evidence”. Some of these resemble content cues used in contemporary research, while others point to working hypotheses worth exploring. To examine their potential validity, we re-analyzed data from a quasi-experimental study of 95 perjury cases. The outcomes support the fruitfulness of this approach. Travelling back in time searching for testable ideas about content cues to truth and deception may be worthwhile.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2023
2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10366/153162
url http://hdl.handle.net/10366/153162
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
instname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
instname_str Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
reponame_str GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
collection GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404651741249536
score 15,301629

Registros relacionados