Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case

Objective: To compare techniques to analyze the content validity of measurement instruments applicable to nursing care research through a practical case. Method: Secondary study derived from validating the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS) in a Chilean hospital. The study setting was hospita...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Hurtado-Arenas, P, Guevara, MR, González-Chordá, VM
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Recursos:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:r-fisabio___::30925e3f68eb09e1687ac6cabd5a5b58
Acesso em linha:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/21036
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
id ES_1bfb9f6d6c86558d6bd60cab204e8e91
oai_identifier_str oai:dnet:r-fisabio___::30925e3f68eb09e1687ac6cabd5a5b58
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical caseHurtado-Arenas, PGuevara, MRGonzález-Chordá, VMValidation studyMethodological research in nursingClinical nursing researchSurveys and questionnairesValidation studyMethodological research in nursingClinical nursing researchSurveys and questionnairesObjective: To compare techniques to analyze the content validity of measurement instruments applicable to nursing care research through a practical case. Method: Secondary study derived from validating the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS) in a Chilean hospital. The study setting was hospital care, with a population focused on nursing staff and a sample of 12 expert nurses who are teachers or have clinical experience in quality and patient safety. Design and content validity test based on three phases: identification of primary methods, calculation of methods, comparison of similarities and differences of methods. Results: Lawsche, Tristan-Lopez, Lynn, Polit et al. methods are similar. The modified kappa value is similar to the content validity index (I-CVI) value, with a slight variation when penalizing the value by probability according to chance. There are significant differences between all methods and Hernandez Nieto's content validity coefficient (CVC). Conclusions: The Polit et al. method is more rigorous, and its mathematical formulation is better justified, providing solidity to clinical nursing research. Furthermore, the Hernandez-Nieto method is suggested when validating more than one characteristic. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/21036Enfermeria ClinicaISSN: 11308621ISSNe: 15792013reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científicainstname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)Españolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dnet:r-fisabio___::30925e3f68eb09e1687ac6cabd5a5b582026-06-11T12:45:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
title Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
spellingShingle Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
Hurtado-Arenas, P
Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
title_short Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
title_full Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
title_fullStr Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
title_sort Comparison of content validity indices for clinical nursing research: A practical case
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hurtado-Arenas, P
Guevara, MR
González-Chordá, VM
author Hurtado-Arenas, P
author_facet Hurtado-Arenas, P
Guevara, MR
González-Chordá, VM
author_role author
author2 Guevara, MR
González-Chordá, VM
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
topic Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
Validation study
Methodological research in nursing
Clinical nursing research
Surveys and questionnaires
description Objective: To compare techniques to analyze the content validity of measurement instruments applicable to nursing care research through a practical case. Method: Secondary study derived from validating the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety (HSOPS) in a Chilean hospital. The study setting was hospital care, with a population focused on nursing staff and a sample of 12 expert nurses who are teachers or have clinical experience in quality and patient safety. Design and content validity test based on three phases: identification of primary methods, calculation of methods, comparison of similarities and differences of methods. Results: Lawsche, Tristan-Lopez, Lynn, Polit et al. methods are similar. The modified kappa value is similar to the content validity index (I-CVI) value, with a slight variation when penalizing the value by probability according to chance. There are significant differences between all methods and Hernandez Nieto's content validity coefficient (CVC). Conclusions: The Polit et al. method is more rigorous, and its mathematical formulation is better justified, providing solidity to clinical nursing research. Furthermore, the Hernandez-Nieto method is suggested when validating more than one characteristic. (c) 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/21036
url https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/21036
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
language_invalid_str_mv Español
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Enfermeria Clinica
ISSN: 11308621
ISSNe: 15792013
reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
instname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
instname_str Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
reponame_str r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
collection r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869404197746638848
score 15.812455

Registos relacionados