Audit firm tenure and independence: a comprehensive investigation of audit qualifications in Spain
The European Commission's Green Paper on Audit Policy has raised serious concerns about external auditor independence and also encouraged further research about the implications of long audit firm tenures. We examine the effects of audit firm tenure on independence, while measuring independence...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Data de publicação: | 2015 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Ramon Llull (URL) |
| Repositório: | DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/1034 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/1034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2015.02.001 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Auditoria--Espanya Empreses auditores Comptabilitat Auditor independence Accounting quality Multinomial logistic model Litigation risk 33 |
| Resumo: | The European Commission's Green Paper on Audit Policy has raised serious concerns about external auditor independence and also encouraged further research about the implications of long audit firm tenures. We examine the effects of audit firm tenure on independence, while measuring independence using the audit report opinion with a sample of Spanish public companies for the period 2002–2009. Generally, prior research has limited to the examination of modified going-concern opinions to financially distressed firms. This approach limits the generalization of results as well as the ability to address the traditional auditor role in the classical corporate governance scheme. To address these issues, we propose a multinomial approach which not only includes all types of audit qualifications in the analysis, but also considers the implications of going-concern opinions for the auditor–client relationship. Our results show that auditors seem willing to sacrifice independence in lengthy engagements, but only for non-going-concern modified opinions. This finding is robust to various proxies of accounting quality. |
|---|