What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological”
[EN] Considered from a normative perspective, secular bioethics does not require anything from a theological discourse. And likewise, it does not require anything from an atheist discourse either. It depends rather on a debate whose pluralism has to be grounded in secular conditions. Therefore, it c...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión enviada para evaluación y publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/154568 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154568 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Religión Secular Christianity 5101.10 Religión |
| id |
ES_0d19bbe3c6e16c8b851b7ada12e69db7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/154568 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological”Roldan Gómez, IsabelReligiónSecularChristianity5101.10 Religión[EN] Considered from a normative perspective, secular bioethics does not require anything from a theological discourse. And likewise, it does not require anything from an atheist discourse either. It depends rather on a debate whose pluralism has to be grounded in secular conditions. Therefore, it cannot be expected that a substantive approach should be the ground of the public bioethical discourse. A different question would be the proper place of religion (religions with political valence as Christianity) at legally tackling bioethical issues which touch upon sensitive religious topics. But this is a political matter, not a theoretical gap.Taylor and Francis202420242020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/154568reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamancainstname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)Españolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1545682026-06-07T06:28:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| title |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| spellingShingle |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” Roldan Gómez, Isabel Religión Secular Christianity 5101.10 Religión |
| title_short |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| title_full |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| title_fullStr |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| title_full_unstemmed |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| title_sort |
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological” |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Roldan Gómez, Isabel |
| author |
Roldan Gómez, Isabel |
| author_facet |
Roldan Gómez, Isabel |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Religión Secular Christianity 5101.10 Religión |
| topic |
Religión Secular Christianity 5101.10 Religión |
| description |
[EN] Considered from a normative perspective, secular bioethics does not require anything from a theological discourse. And likewise, it does not require anything from an atheist discourse either. It depends rather on a debate whose pluralism has to be grounded in secular conditions. Therefore, it cannot be expected that a substantive approach should be the ground of the public bioethical discourse. A different question would be the proper place of religion (religions with political valence as Christianity) at legally tackling bioethical issues which touch upon sensitive religious topics. But this is a political matter, not a theoretical gap. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2024 2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
submittedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154568 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154568 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Español |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Español |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca instname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| reponame_str |
GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| collection |
GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869403320999739392 |
| score |
15,228081 |