Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars

Objetive: To identify which of the adhesive techniques presents greater microleakage. Methodology: In vitro experimental study, in which 60 premolars divided randomly into 4 groups were used. Group 1 (CT): conventional technique, conditioning with 37% orthophosphoric acid and sealant, Group 2 (GAA):...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Benavides Morejon, Evelyn, Villacís-Altamirano, Inés
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:Ecuador
Institución:Universidad Central del Ecuador
Repositorio:Revista Odontología
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/5909
Acceso en línea:https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:microfiltración
adhesivos
selladores de fosas y fisuras
microleakage
adhesives
pit and fissure sealants
id EC_ea960d8b70084c34468390fa913e389e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/5909
network_acronym_str EC
network_name_str Ecuador
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolarsAnálisis de las técnicas adhesivas en sellantes dentales: un estudio experimental en premolaresBenavides Morejon, EvelynVillacís-Altamirano, Inésmicrofiltraciónadhesivosselladores de fosas y fisuras microleakageadhesivespit and fissure sealants Objetive: To identify which of the adhesive techniques presents greater microleakage. Methodology: In vitro experimental study, in which 60 premolars divided randomly into 4 groups were used. Group 1 (CT): conventional technique, conditioning with 37% orthophosphoric acid and sealant, Group 2 (GAA): acid conditioning, application of etching and rinsing adhesive and sealant, Group 3 (GAS): application of universal adhesive and sealant, Group 4 (GAAS): acid conditioning, application of universal adhesive and sealant. All samples were thermocycled at 10,000 cycles, and then they were immersed for 24 hours in a 0.5% methylene blue solution and were sectioned buccolingually to evaluate microleakage in a stereomicroscope. The data were evaluated in the statistical software Minitab 19 with a confidence level of 95%. An ANOVA analysis was applied with a Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Results: the GAS group was the one that presented the highest degree of microleakage (mean=1,667), compared to the GAA group that had the lowest degree of microleakage (mean=1,000). However, there were no statistical differences between the GAS, TC, and GAAS adhesive technique groups, nor between the TC, GAAS, and GAA groups. Conclusions: The use of a resinous sealant with universal adhesive without previous acid etching was the one that presented the greatest microleakage.Objetivo: Identificar cuál de las técnicas adhesivas presenta mayor microfiltración. Metodología: Estudio experimental in vitro, fueron usados 60 premolares divididos aleatoriamente en 4 grupos. Grupo 1 (TC): técnica convencional, acondicionamiento con ácido ortofosfórico al 37% y sellante, Grupo 2 (GAA): acondicionamiento ácido, aplicación de adhesivo de grabado y lavado y sellante, Grupo 3 (GAS): aplicación de adhesivo universal y sellante, Grupo 4 (GAAS): acondicionamiento ácido, adhesivo universal y sellante. Se termociclaron las muestras por 10000 ciclos; después fueron inmersas durante 24 horas en azul de metileno al 0.5% y finalmente seccionadas en sentido bucolingual para evaluar la microfiltración en estereomicroscopio. Se evaluaron los datos en el programa estadístico Minitab 19 con una confianza de 95%. Se aplicó un análisis de ANOVA con un post-hoc de Tukey (α=0.05). Resultados: el grupo GAS fue el que presentó el mayor grado de microfiltración (media de 1,667), a diferencia del grupo GAA que tuvo el menor grado de microfiltración (media de 1,000). No presentaron diferencias entre los grupos GAS, TC Y GAAS, ni entre los grupos TC, GAAS Y GAA.  Conclusiones: El uso de sellante resinoso con adhesivo universal sin grabado ácido previo GAS fue el que mayor microfiltración presentó.Universidad Central del Ecuador2024-01-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/590910.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024-e5909Odontología; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Junio; 7-131390-99671390-746810.29166/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024reponame:Revista Odontologíainstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909/8476https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909/8477Derechos de autor 2024 Evelyn Benavides Morejon, Inés Villacís-Altamiranohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-21T12:20:55Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/5909Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*1390-99671390-7468opendoar:02026-07-19T15:08:13.083314Revista Odontología - Universidad Central del Ecuadortrue
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
Análisis de las técnicas adhesivas en sellantes dentales: un estudio experimental en premolares
title Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
spellingShingle Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
Benavides Morejon, Evelyn
microfiltración
adhesivos
selladores de fosas y fisuras
microleakage
adhesives
pit and fissure sealants
title_short Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
title_full Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
title_fullStr Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
title_sort Analysis of adhesive techniques in dental sealants: an experimental study on premolars
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Benavides Morejon, Evelyn
Villacís-Altamirano, Inés
author Benavides Morejon, Evelyn
author_facet Benavides Morejon, Evelyn
Villacís-Altamirano, Inés
author_role author
author2 Villacís-Altamirano, Inés
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv microfiltración
adhesivos
selladores de fosas y fisuras
microleakage
adhesives
pit and fissure sealants
topic microfiltración
adhesivos
selladores de fosas y fisuras
microleakage
adhesives
pit and fissure sealants
description Objetive: To identify which of the adhesive techniques presents greater microleakage. Methodology: In vitro experimental study, in which 60 premolars divided randomly into 4 groups were used. Group 1 (CT): conventional technique, conditioning with 37% orthophosphoric acid and sealant, Group 2 (GAA): acid conditioning, application of etching and rinsing adhesive and sealant, Group 3 (GAS): application of universal adhesive and sealant, Group 4 (GAAS): acid conditioning, application of universal adhesive and sealant. All samples were thermocycled at 10,000 cycles, and then they were immersed for 24 hours in a 0.5% methylene blue solution and were sectioned buccolingually to evaluate microleakage in a stereomicroscope. The data were evaluated in the statistical software Minitab 19 with a confidence level of 95%. An ANOVA analysis was applied with a Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Results: the GAS group was the one that presented the highest degree of microleakage (mean=1,667), compared to the GAA group that had the lowest degree of microleakage (mean=1,000). However, there were no statistical differences between the GAS, TC, and GAAS adhesive technique groups, nor between the TC, GAAS, and GAA groups. Conclusions: The use of a resinous sealant with universal adhesive without previous acid etching was the one that presented the greatest microleakage.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909
10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024-e5909
url https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909
identifier_str_mv 10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024-e5909
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909/8476
https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/5909/8477
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Evelyn Benavides Morejon, Inés Villacís-Altamirano
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2024 Evelyn Benavides Morejon, Inés Villacís-Altamirano
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Central del Ecuador
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Central del Ecuador
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Odontología; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2024): Enero - Junio; 7-13
1390-9967
1390-7468
10.29166/10.29166/odontologia.vol26.n1.2024
reponame:Revista Odontología
instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador
instacron:UCE
instname_str Universidad Central del Ecuador
instacron_str UCE
institution UCE
reponame_str Revista Odontología
collection Revista Odontología
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Odontología - Universidad Central del Ecuador
repository.mail.fl_str_mv *
_version_ 1873870020073750528
score 14,717255

Similares en LA Referencia