Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State

Historically, LGTBI people have suffered stigmatization and structural violence from society and States. Through their constant struggle, LGTBI groups have achieved the recognition of several rights. However, the recognition of many others remains on a pending list. In Ecuador as well as in other co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: León, María Augusta
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:Ecuador
Institución:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
Repositorio:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/1258
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Advisory opinion
same-ex marriage
conventionality control
Ecuador
Opinión consultiva
Matrimomio igualitario
Control de convencionalidad
id EC_b816b7d8d10c569492f11a7545a738cd
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/1258
network_acronym_str EC
network_name_str Ecuador
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
La fuerza vinculante de la OC-24/17 “Identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo” para el Estado ecuatoriano
title Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
spellingShingle Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
León, María Augusta
Advisory opinion
same-ex marriage
conventionality control
Ecuador
Opinión consultiva
Matrimomio igualitario
Control de convencionalidad
Ecuador
title_short Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
title_full Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
title_fullStr Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
title_full_unstemmed Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
title_sort Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian State
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv León, María Augusta
author León, María Augusta
author_facet León, María Augusta
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Advisory opinion
same-ex marriage
conventionality control
Ecuador
Opinión consultiva
Matrimomio igualitario
Control de convencionalidad
Ecuador
topic Advisory opinion
same-ex marriage
conventionality control
Ecuador
Opinión consultiva
Matrimomio igualitario
Control de convencionalidad
Ecuador
description Historically, LGTBI people have suffered stigmatization and structural violence from society and States. Through their constant struggle, LGTBI groups have achieved the recognition of several rights. However, the recognition of many others remains on a pending list. In Ecuador as well as in other countries in the region, the right to marry is still denied to same-sex couples. The Advisory Opinion OC-24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples”, handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, orders States parties of the Inter-American System to adopt all necessary measures to ensure access to marriage to same-sex couples.In Ecuador, the discussion focuses on the question of whether this advisory opinion would generate the obligation to register and celebrate marriages between same-sex couples, even without any legal reform. This article explores the reasons, why states have a duty to incorporate the standards established in this advisory opinion. Among these reasons are the obligation of the state authorities to conduct a control of conventionality as well as the principles of equality and non-discrimination as consubstantial parts of the ius cogens. Another argument is that the Ecuadorian Constitution guarantees, through a series of principles, the direct and immediate application of more favourable rights and guarantees established in international instruments.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258
10.32719/26312484.2019.32.3
url https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258
identifier_str_mv 10.32719/26312484.2019.32.3
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/1159
https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/1169
https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/2377
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Foro: Law Journal; No. 32 (2019): THE RESIGNIFICATION OF FAMILIES FROM A DIVERSITY APPROACH ; 43-60
Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 32 (2019): La resignificación de las familias desde la diversidad; 43-60
2631-2484
1390-2466
reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
instname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
instacron:UASB
instname_str Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
instacron_str UASB
institution UASB
reponame_str Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
collection Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869000002154528768
spelling Legally binding force of Advisory Opinion 24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples” for Ecuadorian StateLa fuerza vinculante de la OC-24/17 “Identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo” para el Estado ecuatorianoLeón, María AugustaAdvisory opinionsame-ex marriageconventionality controlEcuadorOpinión consultivaMatrimomio igualitarioControl de convencionalidadEcuadorHistorically, LGTBI people have suffered stigmatization and structural violence from society and States. Through their constant struggle, LGTBI groups have achieved the recognition of several rights. However, the recognition of many others remains on a pending list. In Ecuador as well as in other countries in the region, the right to marry is still denied to same-sex couples. The Advisory Opinion OC-24/17 “Gender identity, and equality and non-discrimination with regard to same-sex couples”, handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, orders States parties of the Inter-American System to adopt all necessary measures to ensure access to marriage to same-sex couples.In Ecuador, the discussion focuses on the question of whether this advisory opinion would generate the obligation to register and celebrate marriages between same-sex couples, even without any legal reform. This article explores the reasons, why states have a duty to incorporate the standards established in this advisory opinion. Among these reasons are the obligation of the state authorities to conduct a control of conventionality as well as the principles of equality and non-discrimination as consubstantial parts of the ius cogens. Another argument is that the Ecuadorian Constitution guarantees, through a series of principles, the direct and immediate application of more favourable rights and guarantees established in international instruments.Históricamente, las personas LGTBI han sufrido estigmatización y violencia estructural por parte de la sociedad y los Estados. A través de su lucha, los grupos LGTBI han alcanzado el reconocimiento de varios derechos. Sin embargo, el reconocimiento de otros muchos sigue en la lista de pendientes. Tanto en Ecuador como en otros países de la región, el derecho a contraer matrimonio todavía les es negada a las parejas del mismo sexo. La opinión consultiva OC-24/17 “Identidad de género, e igualdad y no discriminación a parejas del mismo sexo”, emitida por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, ordena a los Estados parte del Sistema Interamericano a adoptar todas las medidas necesarias para asegurar el acceso a la figura del matrimonio a las parejas de mismo sexo.En Ecuador, la discusión se centra en la interrogante sobre si esta opinión consultiva generaría la obligación de inscribir y celebrar matrimonios entre parejas del mismo sexo, aun sin mediar reforma legal alguna. Este artículo explora las razones por las que los Estados tienen el deber de incorporar los lineamientos establecidos en esta opinión consultiva. Entre estos motivos, por un lado, están la obligación de las autoridades estatales de realizar un control de convencionalidad, y los principios de igualdad y no discriminación como partes consustanciales del ius cogens. Por otro lado, la Constitución ecuatoriana garantiza, a través de una serie de principios, la aplicación directa e inmediata de derechos y garantías más favorables establecidos en instrumentos internacionales.Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.2019-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/125810.32719/26312484.2019.32.3Foro: Law Journal; No. 32 (2019): THE RESIGNIFICATION OF FAMILIES FROM A DIVERSITY APPROACH ; 43-60Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 32 (2019): La resignificación de las familias desde la diversidad; 43-602631-24841390-2466reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHOinstname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarinstacron:UASBspahttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/1159https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/1169https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/1258/2377info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-04-09T15:09:26Zoai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/1258Portal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02021-04-09T15:09:26falsePortal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02021-04-09T15:09:26Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarfalse
score 15.198674

Similares en LA Referencia