NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador

The study was carried out in Quinsaloma canton, Los Ríos province, Ecuador, in order to determine the level of adoption of technology in cocoa cultivation. 68 beneficiaries of three ONGs were surveyed [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] and 27 producers that they do not receive TA, applying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando, González Osorio, Betty Beatriz, Torres Navarrete, Emma Danielly, Vallejo Sevillano, Luis Alonso, Gaibor Indio, Glenda María, Gaibor Fernández, Ramiro Remigio
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2018
Country:Ecuador
Institution:Universidad Estatal Amazónica
Repository:Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
Language:Spanish
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs_revista.www.uea.edu.ec:article/101
Online Access:https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Cacao Nacional
CCN51
excedente económico
impacto
National Cocoa
economic surplus
impact mitigation
id EC_96abf6a2ed2ba8ef42f4b838aa96e016
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs_revista.www.uea.edu.ec:article/101
network_acronym_str EC
network_name_str Ecuador
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
Las ONGs y su impacto en la adopción de tecnologías: Caso productores de cacao del cantón Quinsaloma, Ecuador
title NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
spellingShingle NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando
Cacao Nacional
CCN51
excedente económico
impacto
National Cocoa
CCN51
economic surplus
impact mitigation
title_short NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
title_full NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
title_fullStr NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
title_sort NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, Ecuador
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando
González Osorio, Betty Beatriz
Torres Navarrete, Emma Danielly
Vallejo Sevillano, Luis Alonso
Gaibor Indio, Glenda María
Gaibor Fernández, Ramiro Remigio
author Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando
author_facet Simba Ochoa, Luis Fernando
González Osorio, Betty Beatriz
Torres Navarrete, Emma Danielly
Vallejo Sevillano, Luis Alonso
Gaibor Indio, Glenda María
Gaibor Fernández, Ramiro Remigio
author_role author
author2 González Osorio, Betty Beatriz
Torres Navarrete, Emma Danielly
Vallejo Sevillano, Luis Alonso
Gaibor Indio, Glenda María
Gaibor Fernández, Ramiro Remigio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cacao Nacional
CCN51
excedente económico
impacto
National Cocoa
CCN51
economic surplus
impact mitigation
topic Cacao Nacional
CCN51
excedente económico
impacto
National Cocoa
CCN51
economic surplus
impact mitigation
description The study was carried out in Quinsaloma canton, Los Ríos province, Ecuador, in order to determine the level of adoption of technology in cocoa cultivation. 68 beneficiaries of three ONGs were surveyed [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] and 27 producers that they do not receive TA, applying a simple random sampling, considering the farmers that in their properties have national cocoa (CN) and Castro Naranjal Collection (CCN-51) and whose plantation age is homogeneous. The data were tabulated by SPSS version 13. It was established that ONGs used various training and accompaniment strategies until post-harvest and commercialization The greatest increase in productivity for CN was found in the producers advised by ACDI-VOCA (105.56%), and for CCN-51 those advised by ANECACAO (189.74%), when comparing the productivity of the CN and CCN-51 of the farmers who received TA in relation to those who did not receive, in the case of the CN. It was 42.31%, 33.33% and 48.72% and for CCN-51 it was 105.74%, 140.47% and 159.77% for each NGO respectively. Higher Profitability was obtained by farmers cattle that received AT from ANECACO with 60.64% (CN) and 130.08% (CCN-51). The economic surplus of the increase in the area grown are the production was greater than 50% with positive displacement of the supply curve and the last one, the impact on productivity is also positive since the average increase in production was 100.11 percent.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101
10.59410/RACYT-v07n03ep04-0101
url https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101
identifier_str_mv 10.59410/RACYT-v07n03ep04-0101
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101/106
https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101/266
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Estatal Amazónica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Estatal Amazónica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018): Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología ; 158 - 171
Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2018): Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología ; 158 - 171
1390-8049
1390-5600
reponame:Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
instname:Universidad Estatal Amazónica
instacron:UEA
instname_str Universidad Estatal Amazónica
instacron_str UEA
institution UEA
reponame_str Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
collection Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Estatal Amazónica
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868999838332354560
spelling NGOs and their impact on the adoption of technologies: Case of cocoa producers in the Quinsaloma canton, EcuadorLas ONGs y su impacto en la adopción de tecnologías: Caso productores de cacao del cantón Quinsaloma, EcuadorSimba Ochoa, Luis FernandoGonzález Osorio, Betty BeatrizTorres Navarrete, Emma DaniellyVallejo Sevillano, Luis AlonsoGaibor Indio, Glenda MaríaGaibor Fernández, Ramiro RemigioCacao NacionalCCN51excedente económicoimpactoNational CocoaCCN51economic surplusimpact mitigationThe study was carried out in Quinsaloma canton, Los Ríos province, Ecuador, in order to determine the level of adoption of technology in cocoa cultivation. 68 beneficiaries of three ONGs were surveyed [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] and 27 producers that they do not receive TA, applying a simple random sampling, considering the farmers that in their properties have national cocoa (CN) and Castro Naranjal Collection (CCN-51) and whose plantation age is homogeneous. The data were tabulated by SPSS version 13. It was established that ONGs used various training and accompaniment strategies until post-harvest and commercialization The greatest increase in productivity for CN was found in the producers advised by ACDI-VOCA (105.56%), and for CCN-51 those advised by ANECACAO (189.74%), when comparing the productivity of the CN and CCN-51 of the farmers who received TA in relation to those who did not receive, in the case of the CN. It was 42.31%, 33.33% and 48.72% and for CCN-51 it was 105.74%, 140.47% and 159.77% for each NGO respectively. Higher Profitability was obtained by farmers cattle that received AT from ANECACO with 60.64% (CN) and 130.08% (CCN-51). The economic surplus of the increase in the area grown are the production was greater than 50% with positive displacement of the supply curve and the last one, the impact on productivity is also positive since the average increase in production was 100.11 percent.El estudio se realizó en el cantón Quinsaloma provincia de Los Ríos, Ecuador, con la finalidad de determinar el nivel de adopción de tecnología en el cultivo de cacao. Se encuestó a 68 bene- ficiarios de tres ONGs [(ADVI-VOCA (25), MCCH (22), ANECACAO (21)] y 27 producto- res que no reciben AT, aplicándose un muestreo aleatorio simple, y considerando a los agricul- tores que en sus propiedades tengan cultivos de cacao nacional (CN) y Colección Castro Naranjal (CCN-51) y cuya edad de la plantación sea homogénea. Los datos se tabularon mediante SPSS versión 13. Se estableció que las ONGs utilizaron varias estrategias de capacitación y acompañamiento hasta la poscosecha y comercialización. El mayor incremento en la productividad para CN se encontró en los productores asesorados por ACDI-VOCA (105.56%); y para CCN-51 los asesorados por ANECACAO (189.74%). Al comparar la productividad del CN y CCN-51 de los agricultores que recibieron AT con relación a los que no recibieron, en el caso del CN fue de 42.31%, 33.33% y 48.72% y para CCN-51 fue de 105.74%, 140.47% y 159.77% para cada ONG respectivamente. La mayor Rentabilidad la obtuvieron los agricultores que recibieron AT por parte de ANECACO con 60.64% (CN) y 130.08% (CCN-51). El excedente económico del incremento de la superficie sembrada como de la producción fue superior al 50% con desplazamiento positivo de la curva de la oferta y el último, el impacto en la productividad también es positivo ya que el incremento promedio de la producción fue 100.11 por ciento.Universidad Estatal Amazónica2018-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/10110.59410/RACYT-v07n03ep04-0101Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018): Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología ; 158 - 171Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2018): Revista Amazónica Ciencia y Tecnología ; 158 - 1711390-80491390-5600reponame:Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnologíainstname:Universidad Estatal Amazónicainstacron:UEAspahttps://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101/106https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/article/view/101/266Derechos de autor 2018 Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnologíahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-08-17T20:34:35Zoai:ojs_revista.www.uea.edu.ec:article/101Portal de revistashttps://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racytUniversidad públicahttp://www.uea.edu.ec/https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/oaiEcuadoropendoar:2023-08-17T20:34:35falsePortal de revistashttps://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racytUniversidad públicahttp://www.uea.edu.ec/https://revistas.uea.edu.ec/index.php/racyt/oaiEcuadoropendoar:2023-08-17T20:34:35Revista Amazónica. Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Estatal Amazónicafalse
score 15,301629

Similar Items