UNASUR and the ability to act face of international conflicts
The article refers to UNASUR and the management of political crises with important implications and repercussions for South America since 2008. In this logic, the author focuses on the organization ?s role with regard to conflict resolution using case analysis method: Ecuador in 2010 and Paraguay in...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2013 |
| País: | Ecuador |
| Institución: | Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
| Repositorio: | Revista Comentario Internacional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/47 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/comentario/article/view/47 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | UNASUR democracia institucionalidad Ecuador Paraguay regionalismo paz. democracy institutionalism regionalism peace |
| Sumario: | The article refers to UNASUR and the management of political crises with important implications and repercussions for South America since 2008. In this logic, the author focuses on the organization ?s role with regard to conflict resolution using case analysis method: Ecuador in 2010 and Paraguay in 2012, both extreme cases of institutional vulnerability. Therefore, he proposes that UNASUR ?s political and institutional agenda demonstrate a weak point: conflict resolution, directly related with democracy and peace-keeping, important factors for the Nation State. |
|---|