Insights on Gottlob Frege’s Puzzle
In order to understand the philosophical context where the present volume of Philosophy of Language’s discussion starts from, I introduce Gottlob Frege’s Puzzle and explain why it has been a problem for direct-reference theorists. I show how Howard Wettstein and Stavroula Glezakos have tried to diss...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Costa Rica |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/21312 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/21312 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | gottlob frege’s puzzle cognitive significance direct-reference theorists howard wettstein stavroula glezakos puzzle de gottlob frege significado cognitivo teóricos de la referencia directa |
| Sumario: | In order to understand the philosophical context where the present volume of Philosophy of Language’s discussion starts from, I introduce Gottlob Frege’s Puzzle and explain why it has been a problem for direct-reference theorists. I show how Howard Wettstein and Stavroula Glezakos have tried to dissolve Frege’s Puzzle by focusing our attention on Glezakos’s argument, which will be the main target in the discussion below. |
|---|