Sexual dimorphism in primate aerobic capacity: a phylogenetic test

Male intrasexual competition should favour increased male physical prowess. This should in turn result in greater aerobic capacity in males than in females (i.e. sexual dimorphism) and a correlation between sexual dimorphism in aerobic capacity and the strength of sexual selection among species. How...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lindenfors, P., Revell, L. J., Nunn, C. L.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2010
País:Colombia
Institución:Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/26941
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01983.x
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/26941
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Haematocrit
Phylogenetic comparative method
Phylogenetic t?test
Red blood cells
Sexual selection
Descripción
Sumario:Male intrasexual competition should favour increased male physical prowess. This should in turn result in greater aerobic capacity in males than in females (i.e. sexual dimorphism) and a correlation between sexual dimorphism in aerobic capacity and the strength of sexual selection among species. However, physiological scaling laws predict that aerobic capacity should be lower per unit body mass in larger than in smaller animals, potentially reducing or reversing the sex difference and its association with measures of sexual selection. We used measures of haematocrit and red blood cell (RBC) counts from 45 species of primates to test four predictions related to sexual selection and body mass: (i) on average, males should have higher aerobic capacity than females, (ii) aerobic capacity should be higher in adult than juvenile males, (iii) aerobic capacity should increase with increasing sexual selection, but also that (iv) measures of aerobic capacity should co?vary negatively with body mass. For the first two predictions, we used a phylogenetic paired t?test developed for this study. We found support for predictions (i) and (ii). For prediction (iii), however, we found a negative correlation between the degree of sexual selection and aerobic capacity, which was opposite to our prediction. Prediction (iv) was generally supported. We also investigated whether substrate use, basal metabolic rate and agility influenced physiological measures of oxygen transport, but we found only weak evidence for a correlation between RBC count and agility.