Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.

Este artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Han...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2018
País:Colombia
Recursos:Universidad Católica de Colombia
Repositório:RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29939
Acesso em linha:https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Autonomía
Ciudadanía
Arendt
Democracia
Desestatización
Autonomy
Citizenship
Democracy
Statelessness
id CO_e1cccd391478ba6eddc46e8d1c2e8726
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983/29939
network_acronym_str CO
network_name_str Colombia
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
spellingShingle Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
Autonomía
Ciudadanía
Arendt
Democracia
Desestatización
Autonomy
Citizenship
Arendt
Democracy
Statelessness
title_short Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_full Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_fullStr Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_full_unstemmed Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
title_sort Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
author Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
author_facet Lalatta Costerbosa, Marina
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Autonomía
Ciudadanía
Arendt
Democracia
Desestatización
Autonomy
Citizenship
Arendt
Democracy
Statelessness
topic Autonomía
Ciudadanía
Arendt
Democracia
Desestatización
Autonomy
Citizenship
Arendt
Democracy
Statelessness
description Este artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Hannah Arendt sobre la desestatización desempeña un papel paradigmático en esta perspectiva política y filosófica sobre la ciudadanía. A través del análisis de Arendt, el artículo intenta mostrar la naturaleza esencial de la relación entre democracia y ciudadanía inclusiva.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Journal article
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 2539-2239
2389-8232
https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
identifier_str_mv 2539-2239
2389-8232
url https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/2628/2437
Núm. 9 , Año 2018 :Enero - Junio
184
9
164
5
Soft Power
Agier, M. (2008). On the Margins of the World. The Refugee Experience Today. Malden/MA: Politiy Press.
Agier, M. (2011). Managing the Undesirables. Refugee Camps and Humanitarians Government. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Andrews, G. (Ed.) (1991). Citizenship. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Arendt, H. (1972). On Violence. In Crisis of the Republic (pp. 103-198). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.
Arendt, H. (1979). The Origin of Totalitarianism (new edition with added Prefaces). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.
Arendt, H. (1998).The Human Condition (Introduction by M. Canovan (Ed.)). Chicago-London: Chicago University Press.
Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik?: Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß. München: Piper Taschenbuch
Balibar, É. (2010). Arendt, le droit aux droits et la désobéissance civique. In La proposition de l’égaliberté (pp. 201-227). Paris: Puf.
Barbelet, J. M. (1989). Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. New York: Indiana University Press.
Brożek, B. (2013). Philosophy and Neuroscience. Three Modes of Interaction. In J. Stelmach, B. Brożek & Ł. Kurek (Eds.). Philosophy in Neuroscience. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castelfranchi, C. (2014). NeuroNorme: per un approccio non riduzionista. Cosa cercare e non cercare nel cervello. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, n.s.
Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Le Seuil.
Cohen, J. & Sabel, C. (1997, May). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), pp. 313-342.
Cole, P. & Wellman, C. H. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Goldoni, M. & Maccorkindale, C. (2012) (Eds.). Hannah Arendt and the Law. Oxford-Portland/NY: Hart.
Greblo, E. (2017). Luoghi a perdere. Hannah Arendt e la questione dei rifugiati. Scienza & Politica, 29(57), pp. 195-212.
Dewey, J. (1954). The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.
Habermas, J. (1992). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge/MA: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hayden, P. (2009). Political Evil in a Global Age. Hannah Arendt and International Theory. London: Routledge.
Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modern State. Essays on State, Power, and Democracy. London: Polity Press.
Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. II. 3. I. London: A. Millar.
Iacoboni, M. (2008). I neuroni a specchio. Come capiamo ciò che fanno gli altri. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In AA. BD., Kants gesammelte Schriften. IV. 1904, II. (pp. 385-463). Berlin: Hrsg. Von der Koniglich Preusen, Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In AA. BD. Kants gesammelte Schriften VIII, 1912, II. (pp. 273-314). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Der Streit der Fakultäten. London: Forgotten Books (2018).
Kelsen, H. (1929). The Essence and Value of Democracy. N. Urbinati and C. Invernizzi Accetti (Eds.) (2013). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Klabbers, J. (2007, March). Possible Islands of Predictability. The Legal Thought of Hannah Arendt. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20(1), pp. 1-23.
Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (2014). Democrazia assediata. Rome: DeriveApprodi.
Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (Ed.) (2016). Lo spazio della responsabilità. Approdi e limiti delle neuroscienze. Bologna: il Mulino.
La Torre, M. (2004). Cittadinanza e ordine politico. Diritti, cirsi della sovranità e sfera pubblica in una prospettiva europea. Torino: Giappichelli.
La Torre, M. (2013). Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 99(3), pp. 400-416.
Lukes, S. (1982). Relativism in Its Place. In S. Lukes & M. Hollis (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macready, J. D. (2017). Hannah Arendt and the Fragility of Human Dignity. Lanham/MD: Lexington Books.
McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. (2008, April). Seeing Is Believing. The Effect of Brain Images on Judgements of Scientific Reasoning. Cognition. 107(1), pp. 343-352.
McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. & Rhodes, M. G. (2011). The Influence of FMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision Making. Behavioural Sciences and Law, pp. 566-577.
Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
Nedelsky, J. (2001). Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, Imagination, and Politics. Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 103-120). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rizzato, M. & Donelli, D. (2011). Io sono il tuo specchio. Neuroni specchio ed empatia. Torino: Edizioni Amrita.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soft Power
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soft Power
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628
reponame:RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
instname:Universidad Católica de Colombia
instacron:Universidad Católica de Colombia
instname_str Universidad Católica de Colombia
instacron_str Universidad Católica de Colombia
institution Universidad Católica de Colombia
reponame_str RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
collection RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católica
_version_ 1825052981669658624
spelling Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.Democracy is inclusive : arendt’s paradigm.Lalatta Costerbosa, MarinaAutonomíaCiudadaníaArendtDemocraciaDesestatizaciónAutonomyCitizenshipArendtDemocracyStatelessnessEste artículo se centra en la conexión entre una idea inclusiva de ciudadanía y el concepto real de democracia. Una buena definición de democracia enfatiza en el principio básico de la autonomía, y una noción adecuada de autonomía implica una doble cara: la pública y la personal. La reflexión de Hannah Arendt sobre la desestatización desempeña un papel paradigmático en esta perspectiva política y filosófica sobre la ciudadanía. A través del análisis de Arendt, el artículo intenta mostrar la naturaleza esencial de la relación entre democracia y ciudadanía inclusiva.This paper focuses on the connection between an inclusive idea of citizenship and the real concept of democracy. A good definition of democracy stresses the basic principle of autonomy, and an adequate notion of autonomy implies the double face of it: the public and the personal one. Hannah Arendt’s reflection on statelessness plays a paradigmatic role in this political and philosophical perspective on citizenship. Through Arendt’s analysis, the article tries to show the essential nature of the relationship between democracy and inclusive citizenshipSoft Power2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018-01-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdf2539-22392389-8232https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/2628reponame:RIUCaC - Repositorio U. Católicainstname:Universidad Católica de Colombiainstacron:Universidad Católica de Colombiaenghttps://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/2628/2437Núm. 9 , Año 2018 :Enero - Junio18491645Soft PowerAgier, M. (2008). On the Margins of the World. The Refugee Experience Today. Malden/MA: Politiy Press.Agier, M. (2011). Managing the Undesirables. Refugee Camps and Humanitarians Government. Cambridge: Polity Press.Andrews, G. (Ed.) (1991). Citizenship. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Arendt, H. (1972). On Violence. In Crisis of the Republic (pp. 103-198). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.Arendt, H. (1979). The Origin of Totalitarianism (new edition with added Prefaces). San Diego-New York-London: Harcourt Brace & Co.Arendt, H. (1998).The Human Condition (Introduction by M. Canovan (Ed.)). Chicago-London: Chicago University Press.Arendt, H. (2003). Was ist Politik?: Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß. München: Piper TaschenbuchBalibar, É. (2010). Arendt, le droit aux droits et la désobéissance civique. In La proposition de l’égaliberté (pp. 201-227). Paris: Puf.Barbelet, J. M. (1989). Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Benhabib, S. (Ed.) (1996). Democracy and Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights. The Predicament of Common Responsibility. New York: Indiana University Press.Brożek, B. (2013). Philosophy and Neuroscience. Three Modes of Interaction. In J. Stelmach, B. Brożek & Ł. Kurek (Eds.). Philosophy in Neuroscience. Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.Carens, J. H. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Castelfranchi, C. (2014). NeuroNorme: per un approccio non riduzionista. Cosa cercare e non cercare nel cervello. Rivista di filosofia del diritto, III, n.s.Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Le Seuil.Cohen, J. & Sabel, C. (1997, May). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), pp. 313-342.Cole, P. & Wellman, C. H. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Goldoni, M. & Maccorkindale, C. (2012) (Eds.). Hannah Arendt and the Law. Oxford-Portland/NY: Hart.Greblo, E. (2017). Luoghi a perdere. Hannah Arendt e la questione dei rifugiati. Scienza & Politica, 29(57), pp. 195-212.Dewey, J. (1954). The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press.Habermas, J. (1992). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge/MA: The MIT Press.Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Hayden, P. (2009). Political Evil in a Global Age. Hannah Arendt and International Theory. London: Routledge.Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and the Modern State. Essays on State, Power, and Democracy. London: Polity Press.Hume, D. (1748). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. II. 3. I. London: A. Millar.Iacoboni, M. (2008). I neuroni a specchio. Come capiamo ciò che fanno gli altri. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In AA. BD., Kants gesammelte Schriften. IV. 1904, II. (pp. 385-463). Berlin: Hrsg. Von der Koniglich Preusen, Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In AA. BD. Kants gesammelte Schriften VIII, 1912, II. (pp. 273-314). Berlin: De Gruyter.Kant, I. (1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Der Streit der Fakultäten. London: Forgotten Books (2018).Kelsen, H. (1929). The Essence and Value of Democracy. N. Urbinati and C. Invernizzi Accetti (Eds.) (2013). Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Klabbers, J. (2007, March). Possible Islands of Predictability. The Legal Thought of Hannah Arendt. Leiden Journal of International Law, 20(1), pp. 1-23.Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (2014). Democrazia assediata. Rome: DeriveApprodi.Lalatta Costerbosa, M. (Ed.) (2016). Lo spazio della responsabilità. Approdi e limiti delle neuroscienze. Bologna: il Mulino.La Torre, M. (2004). Cittadinanza e ordine politico. Diritti, cirsi della sovranità e sfera pubblica in una prospettiva europea. Torino: Giappichelli.La Torre, M. (2013). Hannah Arendt and the Concept of Law. Against the Tradition. Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, 99(3), pp. 400-416.Lukes, S. (1982). Relativism in Its Place. In S. Lukes & M. Hollis (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Macready, J. D. (2017). Hannah Arendt and the Fragility of Human Dignity. Lanham/MD: Lexington Books.McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. (2008, April). Seeing Is Believing. The Effect of Brain Images on Judgements of Scientific Reasoning. Cognition. 107(1), pp. 343-352.McCabe, D. P. & Castel, A. D. & Rhodes, M. G. (2011). The Influence of FMRI Lie Detection Evidence on Juror Decision Making. Behavioural Sciences and Law, pp. 566-577.Mill, J. S. (2008). On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.Nedelsky, J. (2001). Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy. In R. Beiner & J. Nedelsky (Eds.), Judgment, Imagination, and Politics. Themes from Kant and Arendt (pp. 103-120). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Rizzato, M. & Donelli, D. (2011). Io sono il tuo specchio. Neuroni specchio ed empatia. Torino: Edizioni Amrita.Marina Lalatta Costerbosa - 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/2024-06-02T14:32:17Z
score 15,812455

Registros relacionados