Orthographic and associative neighborhood density effects: What is shared, what is different?

Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of a...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Müller, Oliver, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Carreiras, Manuel
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2010
País:Colombia
Recursos:Universidad del Rosario
Repositório:Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/22907
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00960.x
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/22907
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Association
ERP
Language
Orthographic neighbors
Semantic representation
Visual word recognition
Descrição
Resumo:Words with many orthographic neighbors elicit a larger N400 than words with few orthographic neighbors. This has been interpreted as stronger overall semantic activation due to orthographic neighbors activating their semantic representations. To investigate this claim, we manipulated the number of associates of words (NoA), a variable directly affecting overall semantic activation, and compared this to the ERP effect of the number of orthographic neighbors (N) in a lexical decision task. Words with high NoA and with high N produced a very similar increase of the N400. In addition, a higher N increased the amplitude of the Late Positive Complex. The common N400 effect suggests that N affects semantic activation, like NoA does. The late positive effect specific to N could occur because words with few orthographic neighbors initially elicit little activity in the orthographic system, thereby resembling nonwords, which leads to distinct processing. © 2010 Society for Psychophysiological Research.