The trap of 'multiple temporalities': it is possible to write without chronology
In this paper, I attempt to answer the following questions: to what extent can we affirm, broadening the meaning of the phrase by Denise da Silva (2016), that "others" are "necessarily without time"?; why does the "other" appear to be carrying "another" tempor...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
| Repositório: | Esboços (Online) |
| Idioma: | espanhol |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/97661 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/esbocos/article/view/97661 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Multiple temporalities Synchronization of temporalities Time-as-noum Time-as-relation Temporalidades múltiples Sincronización de temporalidades Tiempo-sustantivo Tiempo-relación |
| Resumo: | In this paper, I attempt to answer the following questions: to what extent can we affirm, broadening the meaning of the phrase by Denise da Silva (2016), that "others" are "necessarily without time"?; why does the "other" appear to be carrying "another" temporality when it becomes visible?; why is the concept of "multiple temporalities" flawed at its origin?. In this regard, I attempt to show how, in constituting itself as a historical subject, the West transforms time-as-relation into time-as-noun and how the "problem" of the synchronization of the multiplicity of temporalities is its counterpart. |
|---|