The application of the principle of solidarity in the judicialization of health based on the principles of SUS, the establishment of understanding by the Supreme Court and the trajectory of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Objective: to analyze the phenomenon of judicialization of health and the theme of solidarity among federated entities from the principles of comprehensiveness and universality that guide the Unified Health System (SUS), as well as the recent position of the Federal Superior Court (STF) based on the...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) |
| Repositório: | Cadernos Ibero-Americanos de Direito Sanitário (Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br:article/549 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://www.cadernos.prodisa.fiocruz.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/549 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Judicialização da saúde. Integralidade em saúde. Sistema Único de Saúde. Poder Judiciário. Health's judicialization. Integrality in health. Unified Health System. Judiciary. Judicialización de la salud. Integralidad en salud. Sistema Único de Salud. Poder Judicial. |
| Resumo: | Objective: to analyze the phenomenon of judicialization of health and the theme of solidarity among federated entities from the principles of comprehensiveness and universality that guide the Unified Health System (SUS), as well as the recent position of the Federal Superior Court (STF) based on the path of judicialization in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methods: a bibliographic survey and analysis of data collected from the Drug Administration System of the Health Secretariat of the State of Rio Grande do Sul were performed. Results: the repeated adoption the thesis of solidarity between the courts by the courts in health actions ends up undermining the SUS, insofar as it does not observe the principles of organization and financing of public health policy. Conclusion: despite the new position of the Supreme Court means an advance, in the sense that the obligation is solidary among the entities, but it is up to the judicial authority to direct compliance with the rules of division of powers, as well as compensation to those who bore the burden. financial, many procedural doubts remain, and the observance of the principles of organization and financing of the SUS are fundamental to ensure the existence of a universal system. |
|---|