Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities

Before the entry into force of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, the amicus curiae was disciplined in a sparse and punctual manner in the legislation, including, among others, Law No. 9,868/1999, which provides for the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality and the Law No. 9,882/1999, which provides f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Carvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de, Dutra, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Institución:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
Repositorio:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/474
Acceso en línea:https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:amicus curiae
processo civil
novo
civil Procedure
new
id BR_f1fc76305bb2cf78fc85712ed3b809d4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/474
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
spelling Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilitiesAmicus curiae no processo civil: Novas possibilidadesamicus curiaeprocesso civilnovoamicus curiaecivil ProcedurenewBefore the entry into force of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, the amicus curiae was disciplined in a sparse and punctual manner in the legislation, including, among others, Law No. 9,868/1999, which provides for the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality and the Law No. 9,882/1999, which provides for the Allegation of Non-compliance with Fundamental Precepts1. The CPC was right to strengthen and expand the presence of this agent in our legal system, as can be seen from reading article 138, enriching the debate from new perspectives of those who can effectively contribute to the excellence, completeness and precision of the final provision2. When deciding, the judge has the duty to examine and evaluate the existing evidence in the case, face all the central arguments of the controversy, appropriately interpreting and applying legal norms, in addition to observing the reasonable duration of the process. The substantial contradiction allows the subjects of the process, through this cooperative dialogue, the right to influence the formation of the judge's conviction, giving him the conditions to make a more complete and well-founded decision. In this context, the participation of the amicus curiae proves to be fundamental to encourage the procedural debate and, therefore, give rise to more complete and well-founded judicial pronouncements.Antes da entrada em vigor do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, o amicus curiae era disciplinado de forma esparsa e pontual na legislação, podendo ser citadas, dentre outras, a Lei nº 9.868/1999, que dispõe sobre a Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade e a Lei nº 9.882/1999, que dispõe sobre a Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental1. O CPC acertou ao fortalecer e ampliar a presença desse agente em nosso ordenamento jurídico, conforme se depreende da leitura do artigo 138, enriquecendo o debate a partir de novas perspectivas de quem pode efetivamente contribuir para a excelência, completude e precisão do provimento final2. Ao decidir, o juiz tem o dever de examinar e valorar as provas existentes nos autos, enfrentar todos os argumentos centrais da controvérsia, interpretando e aplicando adequadamente as normas jurídicas, além de observar a razoável duração do processo. O contraditório substancial permite aos sujeitos do processo, por meio desse diálogo cooperativo, o direito de influenciar a formação do convencimento do julgador, conferindo-lhe condições de proferir uma decisão mais completa e fundamentada. Nesse contexto, a participação do amicus curiae revela-se fundamental para fomentar o debate processual e, com isso, ensejar a prolação de pronunciamentos judiciais mais completos e fundamentados.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2023-01-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 3 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 101-1182236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474/206Copyright (c) 2022 Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de Carvalho, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles Dutrahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi deDutra, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles2023-12-11T15:25:18Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/474Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-11T15:25:18Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
Amicus curiae no processo civil: Novas possibilidades
title Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
spellingShingle Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
Carvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de
amicus curiae
processo civil
novo
amicus curiae
civil Procedure
new
title_short Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
title_full Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
title_fullStr Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
title_full_unstemmed Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
title_sort Amicus curiae in civil proceedings: New possibilities
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de
Dutra, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles
author Carvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de
author_facet Carvalho, Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de
Dutra, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles
author_role author
author2 Dutra, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles
author2_role author
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv amicus curiae
processo civil
novo
amicus curiae
civil Procedure
new
topic amicus curiae
processo civil
novo
amicus curiae
civil Procedure
new
description Before the entry into force of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, the amicus curiae was disciplined in a sparse and punctual manner in the legislation, including, among others, Law No. 9,868/1999, which provides for the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality and the Law No. 9,882/1999, which provides for the Allegation of Non-compliance with Fundamental Precepts1. The CPC was right to strengthen and expand the presence of this agent in our legal system, as can be seen from reading article 138, enriching the debate from new perspectives of those who can effectively contribute to the excellence, completeness and precision of the final provision2. When deciding, the judge has the duty to examine and evaluate the existing evidence in the case, face all the central arguments of the controversy, appropriately interpreting and applying legal norms, in addition to observing the reasonable duration of the process. The substantial contradiction allows the subjects of the process, through this cooperative dialogue, the right to influence the formation of the judge's conviction, giving him the conditions to make a more complete and well-founded decision. In this context, the participation of the amicus curiae proves to be fundamental to encourage the procedural debate and, therefore, give rise to more complete and well-founded judicial pronouncements.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474
url https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/474/206
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de Carvalho, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles Dutra
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Luciano Saboia Rinaldi de Carvalho, Gabriel Fernandes Meireles Dutra
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 3 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 101-118
2236-8957
1415-4951
reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron:EMERJ
instname_str Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron_str EMERJ
institution EMERJ
reponame_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
collection Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br
_version_ 1853662350765195264
score 15,198674

Similares en LA Referencia