Between the Rule and the Exception: The Paradox of Duty Being of Penance and ADPF 347

The problematization regarding ADPF 347, in particular the declaration of the “unconstitutional state of affairs” (ECI), demands a critique, in terms of reflection, from the positivist matrix of personality rights, and the problematization outlined by Giorgio Agamben regarding to the state of except...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Félix, Diogo Valério, Ávila, Gustavo Noronha de
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
Repositorio:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/11407
Acceso en línea:https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/11407
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Direitos humanos; Inimigo social; ADPF 347; Estado de coisas inconstitucional; Estado de Exceção
Descripción
Sumario:The problematization regarding ADPF 347, in particular the declaration of the “unconstitutional state of affairs” (ECI), demands a critique, in terms of reflection, from the positivist matrix of personality rights, and the problematization outlined by Giorgio Agamben regarding to the state of exception, insofar as, not only mass incarceration, but the very conditions of the incarcerated person - the prisoner - reveal the possibility of the suspension of his rights, above all, of personality rights. Within this perspective, also following Michel Foucault's reading, the present study presents, as an object of investigation, through the hypothetical-deductive method, the conditions of the paradox in which the unconstitutionality of the prisoner's condition is recognized, and At the same time, this system of promoting mass incarceration is reproduced through the form of the exception, as a result of the operation of law and politics via an exceptional device of capture.