Evaluation of natural vulnerability to contamination of Serra Geral aquifer system In Paraná – Brazil
Groundwater is an important source for human supply, however, it is more and more exposed to contamination due to urbanization, industrial and agricultural expansion. This paper presents a study in regional scale about the natural vulnerability of groundwater in the Serra Geral Aquifer System in Par...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas |
| Repositório: | Águas Subterrâneas (São Paulo. Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.aguassubterraneas.abas.org:article/28857 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28857 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Vulnerability. DRASTIC. GOD. Serra Geral Aquifer System. Vulnerabilidade. DRASTIC. GOD. Sistema Aquífero Serra Geral. |
| Resumo: | Groundwater is an important source for human supply, however, it is more and more exposed to contamination due to urbanization, industrial and agricultural expansion. This paper presents a study in regional scale about the natural vulnerability of groundwater in the Serra Geral Aquifer System in Paraná. DRASTIC and GOD methods with adaptations for fractured aquifers were used and compared through normalization of vulnerability values. The map obtained by DRASTIC method presented the following levels of vulnerability: low (5,01%), moderate (83,13%) and high (11,85%). GOD method presented low (66,21%), moderate (0,67%), high (14,32%) and extreme (18,81) vulnerability. DRASTIC method presented better spatial detail and more intermediate values, while GOD showed abrupt due to the simple parameterization. Although the DRASTIC method presented better results, the choice for a method must be conditioned to the data, human and financial availability. |
|---|