The limits of the concept of “fundamentalism” for the study of religion and politics in Guatemala

The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the problems which arise when the term “fundamentalism” is removed from its original context in the United States and applied in an inclusive sense to militant religious movements around the world. Among researchers, the term “fundamentalism” is used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Melander, Veronica
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2000
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Repositorio:Ciencias Sociales y Religión (Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8669420
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/csr/article/view/8669420
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Fundamentalismo
Religión
Política
Fundamentalism
Religion
Politics
Religião
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the problems which arise when the term “fundamentalism” is removed from its original context in the United States and applied in an inclusive sense to militant religious movements around the world. Among researchers, the term “fundamentalism” is used to describe different phenomena. Undefined discourse about “fundamentalism” thus leads to confusion. The problem concerns some of the evangelical groups that supported the policy of the United States in Central America and the Guatemalan Army during the 1970s and 1980s. Three concrete examples from Guatemala are discussed: 1. The Verbo Church in which the ex-dictator General Efraín Ríos Montt is a member; 2. The paraecclesial agency Overseas Crusades, which planned to make 50 percent of the Guatemalan population evangelical by 1990; 3. The massive conversion to evangelical churches by members of the indigenous Mayan group Ixil in a region where the conflict between the Guerrilla Army of the Poor and the Guatemalan Army was very intense.