Mucosal leishmaniasis: the experience of a brazilian referral center

INTRODUCTION: Pentavalent antimonials (Sbv) are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), despite their high toxicity and only moderate efficacy. The aim of this study was to report therapeutic responses with different available options for ML. METHODS: This study...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Mariana Junqueira Pedras, Janaína de Pina Carvalho, Rosiana Estéfane da Silva, Maria Camilo Ribeiro de Senna, Dario Brock Ramalho, Ana Rabello, Glaucia Fernandes Cota, Hugo Silva Assis Moreira[, Lorena Zaine Matos Martinho
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2018
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositório:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/78355
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/1843/78355
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Leishmaniose
Terapia
Antimoniato de Meglumina
Anfotericina B
Azóis
Descrição
Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Pentavalent antimonials (Sbv) are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML), despite their high toxicity and only moderate efficacy. The aim of this study was to report therapeutic responses with different available options for ML. METHODS: This study was based on a review of clinical records of 35 patients (24 men and 11 women) treated between 2009 and 2015. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 63 years, and the median duration of the disease was 24 months. Seventeen patients received Sbv, while nine patients were treated with liposomal amphotericin B (AmB), and another nine patients were treated with fluconazole. Patients treated with AmB received a total median accumulated dose of 2550mg. The mean duration of azole use was 120 days, and the daily dose ranged from 450 to 900mg. At the three-month follow-up visit, the cure rate was 35%, 67%, and 22% for Sbv, AmB, and azole groups, respectively. At the six-month follow-up visit, the cure rates for Sbv, AmB, and azole groups were 71%, 78%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a scarcity of effective ML treatment alternatives, and based on our observations, fluconazole is not a valid treatment option.