The Judicial Activism of the Supreme Federal Court in the Criminalization of Homophobia and Transphobia (ADO 26 / DF)

The purpose of this article is to analyze the constitutional principle of separation of powers, as well as to work on the concept and origin of judicial activism, and to address the activist behavior of the Federal Supreme Court in its decisions, especially regarding the recent decision. to criminal...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Jordão Portilho, Grazielle, Gonçalves, Me. Jonas Rodrigo, Barbosa Caldas, Paulo Gustavo
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Brasil
Recursos:Faculdade Processus (DF)
Repositorio:Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/183
Acesso em linha:https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/183
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Separation of powers. Judicial activism. Federal Supreme Court. Homophobia and transphobia.
Separação de poderes. Ativismo judicial. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Homofobia e Transfobia.
Descrição
Resumo:The purpose of this article is to analyze the constitutional principle of separation of powers, as well as to work on the concept and origin of judicial activism, and to address the activist behavior of the Federal Supreme Court in its decisions, especially regarding the recent decision. to criminalize homophobia and transphobia, discussed in the context of abstract control of constitutionality, by action of unconstitutionality by omission