A constitucionalidade da Lei 13.303/2016: a distinção entre sociedades estatais “empresárias” e “não empresárias”
Article 1 of Law 13303 has aroused controversy in determining that its provisions apply to both state entities that exploit economic activity and those that provide public services. The issue was brought to the attention of the STF itself, invoking a violation of the constitutional distinction betwe...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Procuradoria Geral do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (PGERJ) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Eletrônica da PGE-RJ |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaeletronica.pge.rj.gov.br:article/10 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaeletronica.pge.rj.gov.br/index.php/pge/article/view/10 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Lei 13.303/2016 aplicação controvérsia sociedades estatais empresárias sociedade estatais não empresárias distinção Law 13303/2016 application controversy state-owned companies non-business state companies distinction |
| Sumario: | Article 1 of Law 13303 has aroused controversy in determining that its provisions apply to both state entities that exploit economic activity and those that provide public services. The issue was brought to the attention of the STF itself, invoking a violation of the constitutional distinction between public companies that provide public services and exploiters of economic activity. But the legal discipline has not been appreciated under a specific prism, related to the distinction between business and non-business, as enshrined in the Civil Code. |
|---|