Efeitos da distribuição do conhecimento de resultados (CR) na aquisição de habilidades motoras

The aim of this study was to investigate how the distribution of knowledge of results (KR) in a relative moderate frequency (50%) affects motor learning. Thirty undergraduatesaged 18 to 30 years (M = 22.75, SD= 2.69) were assigned to one of three experimental groups with different KR conditions: acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Fabiano de Souza Fonseca, Lucas Savassi Figueiredo, Herbert Ugrinowitsch, Rodolfo Novellino Benda
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/49122
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.14610
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/49122
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-8797
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-4978
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-1940
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-8323
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Conhecimento de resultados
CR decrescente
Feedback extrínseco
Habilidades motoras
Capacidade motora
Aprendizagem motora
Desempenho psicomotor
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this study was to investigate how the distribution of knowledge of results (KR) in a relative moderate frequency (50%) affects motor learning. Thirty undergraduatesaged 18 to 30 years (M = 22.75, SD= 2.69) were assigned to one of three experimental groups with different KR conditions: accumulated in beginning group (BG), uniform distribution group (UG) and faded distribution group (FG). The task consisted in transporting 3 tennis balls in a pre-established sequence with target time of 3000 ms. Participants performed 30 trials in acquisition phase and 10 trials in a retention test. The mean of absolute error of FG [M= 73.2 ms ± 25.3] was significantly smaller than those of UG [M= 114.1 ms ± 24.1, p = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.5] and BG [M= 164.5 ms ± 45.7, p = 0.009, ηp2 = 0.5] during retentiontest. FG also showed smaller constant error [M= 44.8 ms ± 49.6] compared to BG [M= 133.5 ms ± 72.6, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.25]. In addition, the mean of absolute error of UG [M= 114.1 ms ± 24.1] was smaller than thatof BG [M= 164.5 ms ± 45.7, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.5]. These results suggest that motor learning is not only determined by the moderate relative frequency of KR, but also by its distribution during practice. Providing KR with fading distribution seems to provide greater benefits to motor learning.