The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan
This paper aims to understand how Giorgio Agamben dialogues with psychoanalysis (especially with Lacan’s work) to support his understanding of the human as an indiscernible zone between nature and culture. To do so, we will exhibit two subjects developed by Agamben: 1) the relation between the conce...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
| Repositorio: | Artefilosofia |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/1007 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Love (Eros) Fantasy Unconscious Infancy Interpretation Amor (Eros) Fantasia Inconsciente Infância Interpretação |
| id |
BR_c0765daa2ebadb4fdcaec1566cef1d44 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/1007 |
| network_acronym_str |
BR |
| network_name_str |
Brasil |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and LacanO simbólico e o diabólico na filosofia e na psicanálise: : infância e inconsciente em Agamben e LacanLove (Eros)FantasyUnconsciousInfancyInterpretationAmor (Eros)FantasiaInconscienteInfânciaInterpretação This paper aims to understand how Giorgio Agamben dialogues with psychoanalysis (especially with Lacan’s work) to support his understanding of the human as an indiscernible zone between nature and culture. To do so, we will exhibit two subjects developed by Agamben: 1) the relation between the concept of in-fancy and Lacan’s notion of the unconscious, and 2) the definition of the symbolic in its relation to the psychoanalytical conception of sign. This will lead us, at the end, to a reflection about the symbolic/diabolic character of language supported by Agamben’s understanding of the platonic concepts of daímōn and Eros. O objetivo deste artigo é expor de que modo Giorgio Agamben dialoga com a psicanálise, especialmente a de Jacques Lacan, para sustentar sua interpretação do humano enquanto uma zona de indiscernibilidade entre natureza e cultura. Para tanto, vamos tratar aqui de duas questões retomadas pela obra de Agamben: a relação entre o conceito de infância e a noção lacaniana de inconsciente, e a caracterização do simbólico em sua relação com as técnicas de interpretação da psicanálise. Isso nos conduzirá, ao fim, a uma reflexão sobre o caráter simbólico/diabólico da linguagem, partindo das reflexões de Agamben sobre os conceitos de daímōn e Eros em Platão.Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto2018-01-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007Artefilosofia; v. 12 n. 23 (2017): Dossiê Arte e Psicanálise; 82-105Artefilosofia; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2017): Dossiê Arte e Psicanálise; 82-1052526-78921809-8274reponame:Artefilosofiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007/1049Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinezi, Gabriel Victor Rocha2021-06-22T13:22:23Zoai:pp.www.periodicos.ufop.br:article/1007Revistahttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/oaiartefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br1809-82742526-7892opendoar:2021-06-22T13:22:23Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan O simbólico e o diabólico na filosofia e na psicanálise: : infância e inconsciente em Agamben e Lacan |
| title |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| spellingShingle |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan Pinezi, Gabriel Victor Rocha Love (Eros) Fantasy Unconscious Infancy Interpretation Amor (Eros) Fantasia Inconsciente Infância Interpretação |
| title_short |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| title_full |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| title_fullStr |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| title_sort |
The symbolic and the diabolic in philosophy and psychoanalysis: : infancy and unconscious in Agamben and Lacan |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pinezi, Gabriel Victor Rocha |
| author |
Pinezi, Gabriel Victor Rocha |
| author_facet |
Pinezi, Gabriel Victor Rocha |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Love (Eros) Fantasy Unconscious Infancy Interpretation Amor (Eros) Fantasia Inconsciente Infância Interpretação |
| topic |
Love (Eros) Fantasy Unconscious Infancy Interpretation Amor (Eros) Fantasia Inconsciente Infância Interpretação |
| description |
This paper aims to understand how Giorgio Agamben dialogues with psychoanalysis (especially with Lacan’s work) to support his understanding of the human as an indiscernible zone between nature and culture. To do so, we will exhibit two subjects developed by Agamben: 1) the relation between the concept of in-fancy and Lacan’s notion of the unconscious, and 2) the definition of the symbolic in its relation to the psychoanalytical conception of sign. This will lead us, at the end, to a reflection about the symbolic/diabolic character of language supported by Agamben’s understanding of the platonic concepts of daímōn and Eros. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-29 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007 |
| url |
https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufop.br/raf/article/view/1007/1049 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Artefilosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Artefilosofia; v. 12 n. 23 (2017): Dossiê Arte e Psicanálise; 82-105 Artefilosofia; Vol. 12 No. 23 (2017): Dossiê Arte e Psicanálise; 82-105 2526-7892 1809-8274 reponame:Artefilosofia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
| instacron_str |
UFOP |
| institution |
UFOP |
| reponame_str |
Artefilosofia |
| collection |
Artefilosofia |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Artefilosofia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artefilosofia.defil@ufop.edu.br || periodicos.sisbin@ufop.edu.br |
| _version_ |
1853661294848114688 |
| score |
15.301629 |