Potentialities of the critical perspectives of Organizational Studies for understanding the peace agreement and post-agreement in Colombia
The peacebuilding process in Colombia involves a host of socio-political phenomena that can be approached by the organizational field. This article analyzes the peace process in Colombia, its agreement, and the social management of its post-agreement usingthe critical theories of organizational stud...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Administração de Empresas |
| Idioma: | español inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/86720 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/86720 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | organizational studies peace process peace agreement and post-agreement critical theory Estudos Organizacionais processo de paz acordo de paz e pós-acordo teoria critica estudios organizacionales proceso de paz acuerdo y posacuerdo de paz teoría crítica |
| Resumo: | The peacebuilding process in Colombia involves a host of socio-political phenomena that can be approached by the organizational field. This article analyzes the peace process in Colombia, its agreement, and the social management of its post-agreement usingthe critical theories of organizational studies, taking some of the taxonomies suggested by Alvesson and Deetz. The methodological approach was qualitative with an analytical and interpretative methodology based on categories of analysis on the links of thepeace process with the naturalization of the social order, the universalization of managerial interests, instrumental rationality, and the production of consent. In this process, the theoretical-conceptual positions, the narratives of the peace process, and itsorganizational manifestations were related. The relational discussion shows that there are various implicit domination structures in peacebuilding, with decisions that follow the logic of managerial efficiency and ideologies typical of the organizational fabric. The article calls for a profound transformation of the organizational structure of peace, generating discourses, strategies, and collective actions that are more committed to equity and social justice within the framework of what has been legally agreed. |
|---|