The natural absence of RPA1N domain did not impair Leishmania amazonensis RPA-1 participation in DNA damage response and telomere protection.

We have previously shown that the subunit 1 of Leishmania amazonensis RPA (LaRPA-1) alone binds the G-rich telomeric strand and is structurally different from other RPA-1. It is analogous to telomere end-binding proteins described in model eukaryotes whose homologues were not identified in the proto...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Da Silveira, Rita de Cássia Viveiros, Da Silva, Marcelo Santos, Nunes, Vinícius Santana, Perez, Arina Marina, Cano, Maria Isabel Nogueira
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Repositorio:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/74948
Acesso em linha:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012002028
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/74948
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:nucleic acid synthesis inhibitor
phleomycin
protozoal protein
cell cycle checkpoint
double stranded DNA break
drug effect
genetics
Leishmania
metabolism
nick end labeling
telomere
Cell Cycle Checkpoints
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
In Situ Nick-End Labeling
Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors
Phleomycins
Protozoan Proteins
Telomere
Descrição
Resumo:We have previously shown that the subunit 1 of Leishmania amazonensis RPA (LaRPA-1) alone binds the G-rich telomeric strand and is structurally different from other RPA-1. It is analogous to telomere end-binding proteins described in model eukaryotes whose homologues were not identified in the protozoan's genome. Here we show that LaRPA-1 is involved with damage response and telomere protection although it lacks the RPA1N domain involved with the binding with multiple checkpoint proteins. We induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Leishmania using phleomycin. Damage was confirmed by TUNEL-positive nuclei and triggered a G1/S cell cycle arrest that was accompanied by nuclear accumulation of LaRPA-1 and RAD51 in the S phase of hydroxyurea-synchronized parasites. DSBs also increased the levels of RAD51 in non-synchronized parasites and of LaRPA-1 and RAD51 in the S phase of synchronized cells. More LaRPA-1 appeared immunoprecipitating telomeres in vivo and associated in a complex containing RAD51, although this interaction needs more investigation. RAD51 apparently co-localized with few telomeric clusters but it did not immunoprecipitate telomeric DNA. These findings suggest that LaRPA-1 and RAD51 work together in response to DNA DSBs and at telomeres, upon damage, LaRPA-1 works probably to prevent loss of single-stranded DNA and to assume a capping function.