A argumentação na língua como subsidio para a avaliação de leitura e produção de textos dissertativo-argumentativos
This paper aims to present an evaluation proposal of the performance in reading and writing dissertative-argumentative texts, based on principles and concepts from the theory of Argumentation in Language – created by Jean-Claude Anscombre and Oswald Ducrot, especially the version of the Theory of th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| Repositorio: | Linha D'Água (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usp.br:article/119698 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/linhadagua/article/view/119698 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Semântica Argumentação na Língua Avaliação Redação Texto dissertativo-argumentativo. Semantic Argumentation in language Evaluation Writing Dissertative-argumentative texts. |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to present an evaluation proposal of the performance in reading and writing dissertative-argumentative texts, based on principles and concepts from the theory of Argumentation in Language – created by Jean-Claude Anscombre and Oswald Ducrot, especially the version of the Theory of the Semantic Blocks and the works inspired by it. The goal is to create criteria which are capable of being less intuitive in judging the performance in reading and wrinting dissertative-argumentative texts. The analysis of the corpora – the Enem 2011’s composition proposal and 50 (fifty) texts written by the students – and the test of the criteria of reading and writing evaluation in this work revealed practice funcionality and efficiency of criteria. The results allow these criteria to be applied in any evaluation processes of dissertative-argumenative texts. Finally, this paper offers theoretical and methodological subisdies which can help teachers and professors to qualify their teaching of reading and writing and the evaluation of student’s texts. |
|---|