Semelhanças, diferenças e rede de relações na transição Pleistoceno-Holoceno e no Holoceno inicial, no Brasil Central
The objective of this paper is to explore the similarities and differences between human occupations in Central Brazil during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition and the Early Holocene (11,000 to 9,000 years ago), and to discuss our understanding of these aspects, questioning its theoretical underpi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/37659 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222019000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/37659 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1262-7559 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Transição Pleistoceno-Holoceno Holoceno inicia Território Tecnologia lítica Rede de relações Caçadores-coletores Geologia estratigráfica Pleistoceno Geologia estratigráfica Holoceno Sítios arqueológicos Brasil Homem primitivo Sociedade primitiva |
| Resumo: | The objective of this paper is to explore the similarities and differences between human occupations in Central Brazil during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition and the Early Holocene (11,000 to 9,000 years ago), and to discuss our understanding of these aspects, questioning its theoretical underpinnings. After bringing together a variety of elements presented by researchers working in four areas (the Serra da Capivara in southeastern Piauí, Serranópolis in southwestern Goiás, northern Minas Gerais in the Peruaçu Valley and Montalvânia region, and Middle Tocantins in the Lajeado River region and Lajeado Mountains), we attempt to compare these areas principally with regard to the use and managementof lithic material, the role of the sites, and organization of territory. The final section contains reflections on the theoretical resources usually utilized to compare archaeological contexts as well as suggested alternatives. |
|---|