Influence of topical acidulated phosphate fluoride on surface roughness of human enamel and different restorative materials
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of topical acidulated phosphate fluoride on the surface roughness of both human enamel and different restorative materials. Methods: Resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer – V), microhybrid composite resin with fluoride (Tetric Ceram – T), a...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| Repositorio: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4045 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/fo/article/view/4045 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Surface roughness composite resin resin-modified glass ionomer cement dental enamel fluoride |
| Sumario: | Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of topical acidulated phosphate fluoride on the surface roughness of both human enamel and different restorative materials. Methods: Resin-modified glass ionomer (Vitremer – V), microhybrid composite resin with fluoride (Tetric Ceram – T), and nanofiller composite resin without fluoride (Z350 – Z) were evaluated. Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF, 1.23%) was applied to half of the specimens (groups VF, TF, ZF and EF). Ten intact human third molars were used to obtain enamel specimens (E). Six experimental groups (n=10) and two control groups (n=10) were formed. The mean surface roughness (Ra) of both the restorative materials and enamel, with and without fluoride, was evaluated with a profilometer. Data were analyzed with an ANOVA, Tukey’s test, Student’s t-test, and Dunn-Bonferroni test at the 5% significance level. Results: The mean values of surface roughness, in micrometers, were as follows: Z=0.60; TF=1.00; ZF=1.05; VF=1.18; T=2.10; V=2.70; E=16.99; and EF=21.19. Both E and EF presented significantly higher surface roughness than the other experimental groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that APF increased the surface roughness of enamel and decreased the surface roughness of both resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and microhybrid composite resin with fluoride. The surface roughness of the nanofiller composite resin was not modified by APF. |
|---|