The CNJ'S gender equity policy and the principle of parity of participation
The study aims to investigate gender equity by analyzing the gender alternation policy drawn up by the National Council of Justice, comparing this policy with Axel Honneth's theory of recognition and Nancy Fraser's principle of parity of participation. Based on the hypothesis that changing...
| Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Faculdade Processus (DF) |
| Repository: | Revista Processus de Estudos de Gestão, Jurídicos e Financeiros (Online) |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.periodicos.processus.com.br:article/1376 |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.processus.com.br/index.php/egjf/article/view/1376 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | CNJ. Gender Equity. Recognition. Parity of participation CNJ Equidade de Gênero Reconhecimento Paridade de participação |
| Summary: | The study aims to investigate gender equity by analyzing the gender alternation policy drawn up by the National Council of Justice, comparing this policy with Axel Honneth's theory of recognition and Nancy Fraser's principle of parity of participation. Based on the hypothesis that changing the Internal Regulations of the aforementioned body is not capable of promoting equitable measures of participation in the Judiciary in isolation, the research will use the hypothetical-deductive method, with a qualitative analysis of bibliographic material. The result indicates that the CNJ's policy of gender alternation is not capable, in isolation, of guaranteeing the equal participation of men and women in the Judiciary. It is essential that the body establishes alternative and complementary measures to combat and repress discrimination against women in the various social strata, moving away from values established by the dominant culture and approaching plural audiences. |
|---|