A hypothesis about a false dichotomy between logic and philosophy
In order to elucidate the false dichotomy between philosophy and logic, I ana-lyze the hypothesis that credits the genesis of such concern to the nature of the relations (effective or intended) between logic and philosophy. From re-luctance to despondency, two theoretical positions seem to explain t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2020 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
| Repositório: | Perspectiva Filosófica (Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:oai.periodicos.ufpe.br:article/248890 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/perspectivafilosofica/article/view/248890 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | logic dialectic organon philosophy logic teaching modern philosophy lógica dialética órganon filosofia ensino de lógica filosofia moderna |
| Resumo: | In order to elucidate the false dichotomy between philosophy and logic, I ana-lyze the hypothesis that credits the genesis of such concern to the nature of the relations (effective or intended) between logic and philosophy. From re-luctance to despondency, two theoretical positions seem to explain the present scenario, i.e., as whether a particular author or philosophical school considers or not logic a constitutive part of philosophy, or whether it is just its mere instrument. Since Brazilian philosophical scenario expresses a cer-tain reticence and, at times, disregard towards logic, I proceed to explain the reasons for this indifference and so reiterate, finally, how logic is indispens-able to any good philosophy. |
|---|