Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron
The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated gen...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA) |
| Repositorio: | Food Science and Technology (Campinas) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:scielo:S0101-20612010000200034 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612010000200034 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | rice fortification with iron sensory evaluation |
| Sumario: | The objective of this study was to examine sensory differences between conventional rice and iron-fortified Ultra Rice rice (UR) and determine consumer acceptance. Differences between both types of rice were analyzed using the Duo-Trio Test on 37 non-trained judges. The Acceptance Test evaluated general rice appearance, color, aroma and taste by 43 non-trained judges, using a 7-point hedonic scale with extremes ranging from "really disliked" and "really liked." There were no significant differences between the analyzed samples of conventional rice and UR rice using Duo-Trio Test. Mean values from the Acceptance Test for the evaluated attributes (general appearance, color, aroma e taste) were 5.6 and 5.9, corresponding to "liked" and "really liked" according to the hedonic scale, respectively. The iron did not alter the sensory characteristics of the final product, and the iron-fortified rice was well accepted. |
|---|