Estimation of recharge of the Guarani Aquifer system based on the application of the water-table fluctuation method in the Ibicui River-RS

The estimation of groundwater recharge is determinant for the sustainable groundwater management. The recharge can be estimated using different methods according to the characteristics of the studied area, the spatial and temporal scales and data availability. The goal is to estimate the recharge of...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Simon, Flora Würth, Reginato, Pedro Antonio Roehe, Kirchheim, Roberto Eduardo, Troian, Guilherme Casarotto
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2017
País:Brasil
Recursos:Associação Brasileira de Águas Subterrâneas
Repositório:Águas Subterrâneas (São Paulo. Online)
Idioma:português
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.aguassubterraneas.abas.org:article/28631
Acesso em linha:https://aguassubterraneas.abas.org/asubterraneas/article/view/28631
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Groundwater recharge. Unconfined aquifers. WTF. Ibicuí basin.
Recarga subterrânea. Aquíferos livres.VNA. Bacia do Ibicuí.
Descrição
Resumo:The estimation of groundwater recharge is determinant for the sustainable groundwater management. The recharge can be estimated using different methods according to the characteristics of the studied area, the spatial and temporal scales and data availability. The goal is to estimate the recharge of unconfined aquifer units that belong to the Guarani Aquifer System, located in the Ibicuí River basin, based on the application of the Water-Table Fluctuation (WTF) method. The water level data were obtained from five monitoring wells of the RIMAS project operated by the CPRM/Brazilian Geological Service. The method was applied to the monthly average of the water level to each monitoring well, in periods between 24 and 39 months. The monthly recharge estimations were about 417,0 mm to 730,7 mm, and the values of precipitation that correspond to recharge varied between 11% and 18%, with an average of 13,82%. It was observed that the highest values occurred in the northwest region of the basin, while the lowest were found in the southern region. The method delivered good results when compared to other assessments that were carried out in the same region.