Constituting the constitution: paradoxes, reasons and results
THE ARTICLE HAS AS ITS OBJECTIVE THE IDENTIFICATION OF PARADOXES ON CONSTITUENT MOMENTS, BUT ALSO ON THE CONTINUITY OF THE TENSION BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND DEMOCRACY. THOSE PARADOXES HELP ON THE COMPREHENSION OF THE PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION AND ON THE PROCESSES OF CON...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| Repositorio: | Revista Direito GV |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/58125 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/58125 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION CONSTITUTIONALISM DEMOCRACY RATIO DECIDENDI JURISDIÇÃO CONSTITUCIONAL CONSTITUCIONALISMO DEMOCRACIA |
| Resumo: | THE ARTICLE HAS AS ITS OBJECTIVE THE IDENTIFICATION OF PARADOXES ON CONSTITUENT MOMENTS, BUT ALSO ON THE CONTINUITY OF THE TENSION BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALISM AND DEMOCRACY. THOSE PARADOXES HELP ON THE COMPREHENSION OF THE PROBLEMS RELATED TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION AND ON THE PROCESSES OF CONSTITUTION MAKING. THEY ARE ALSO IDENTIFIED ON THE CRITIQUES DIRECTED TO THE AGGREGATION OF RESULTS ON THE FORMULATION OF COLLECTIVE DECISIONS. IN REGARD OF BRAZILIAN REALITY, IT IS ANALYSED THE APPROXIMATION OF OUR JURIDICAL TRADITION TO STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE COMMON LAW, AS WELL AS IT IS DISCUSSED THE NONTRANSCENDENCE OF THE DETERMINANT REASONS ON THE DECISIONS MADE BY THE SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. |
|---|