Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade

Abstract: The present paper looks at the interactive construction of multimodal metaphors of interculturereality – a term coined by the author from interculturality and intercorporeality, assuming that intercultural interaction is always an embodied phenomenon, shared among its participants. For thi...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Ladilova, Anna
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Brasil
Recursos:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Repositorio:Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online)
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/16345
Acesso em linha:http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/16345
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Linguística Teórica; Linguística Descritiva; Análise Linguística
metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration; metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.
id BR_5f95f5aa9ae2e16c0a45cbe25c0344db
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/16345
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
title Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
spellingShingle Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
Ladilova, Anna
Linguística Teórica; Linguística Descritiva; Análise Linguística
metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration; metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.
title_short Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
title_full Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
title_fullStr Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
title_sort Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidade
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ladilova, Anna
author Ladilova, Anna
author_facet Ladilova, Anna
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Linguística Teórica; Linguística Descritiva; Análise Linguística
metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration; metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.
topic Linguística Teórica; Linguística Descritiva; Análise Linguística
metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration; metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.
description Abstract: The present paper looks at the interactive construction of multimodal metaphors of interculturereality – a term coined by the author from interculturality and intercorporeality, assuming that intercultural interaction is always an embodied phenomenon, shared among its participants. For this, two videotaped sequences of a group conversation are analyzed drawing upon interaction analysis (Couper-Kuhlen; Selting, 2018). The data was transcribed following the GAT2 (Selting et al., 2011) guidelines, including gesture form annotation, which relied on the system described by Bressem (2013). Gesture function was interpreted drawing on the interactional context and on the system proposed by Kendon (2004) and Bressem and Müller (2013). The results question the validity of the classical conduit metaphor of communication (Reddy, 1979) in the intercultural context and instead propose an embodied approach to the conceptualization of the understanding process among the participants. The analysis also shows that even though the metaphors are multimodal, the metaphoric content is not always evenly distributed among the different modalities (speech, gesture). Apart from that, the metaphorical content is constructed sequentially, referring to preceding metaphors used by the same or different interlocutors and associated with metaphorical blends.Keywords: metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration.Resumo: O presente artigo analisa a construção interativa de metáforas multimodais da interculturealidade – um termo proveniente da interculturalidade e intercorporealidade, assumindo que a interação intercultural é sempre um fenômeno incorporado, compartilhado entre os seus participantes. Para tal, duas sequências gravadas em vídeo de uma conversa em grupo serão analisadas com base na análise da interação (COUPER-KUHLEN; SELTING, 2018). Os dados foram transcritos seguindo as orientações do sistema GAT2 (SELTING et al., 2011), incluindo a anotação da forma gestual, que se baseou no sistema descrito por Bressem (2013). A função dos gestos foi interpretada com base no contexto interacional e no sistema proposto por Kendon (2004) e Bressem e Müller (2013). Os resultados questionam a validade da metáfora clássica do conduto de comunicação (REDDY, 2012) no contexto intercultural e, além disso, propõem uma abordagem corporificada da conceituação do processo de entendimento entre os participantes. A análise também mostra que, embora as metáforas sejam multimodais, o conteúdo metafórico não é sempre uniformemente distribuído entre as diferentes modalidades (fala, gesto). Além disso, o conteúdo metafórico é construído sequencialmente, referindo-se a metáforas anteriores utilizadas pelos mesmos ou diferentes interlocutores e recorrendo a mesclagens metafóricas.Palavras-chave: metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/16345
10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.917-955
url http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/16345
identifier_str_mv 10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.917-955
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/16345/pdf
/*ref*/ATTARDO, S. Humor and Laughter. In: TANNEN, D.; HAMILTON, H. E.; SCHIFFRIN, D. (org.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch8
/*ref*/BARTH-WEINGARTEN, D.; REBER, E.; SELTING, M. (org.). Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23
/*ref*/BOHNSACK, R.; NENTWIG-GESEMANN, I.; NOHL, A. M. Einleitung: Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. In: BOHNSACK, R.; NENTWIG-GESEMANN, I.; NOHL, A.-M. (org.). Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. 2. ed. Wiesbaden: VS, 2007. p. 9-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19895-8_1
/*ref*/BRESSEM, J. A Linguistic Perspective on the Notation of Form Features in Gestures. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MCNEILL, D.; TAßENDORF, S. (org.). Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. p. 1079-1098.
/*ref*/BRESSEM, J.; MÜLLER, C. A Repertoire of German Recurrent Gestures with Pragmatic Functions. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MCNEILL, D.; TAßENDORF, S. (org.). Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. p. 1575-1591.
/*ref*/CIENKI, A. Why study metaphor and gesture? In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. p. 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3
/*ref*/CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. Introduction. In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. p. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.03cie
/*ref*/COUPER-KUHLEN, E.; SELTING, M. (org.). Interacional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
/*ref*/FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. 1. ed. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2002.
/*ref*/FUCHS, T. Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity. In: MEYER, C.; STREECK, J.; JORDAN, J. S. (org.). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001
/*ref*/GARDNER, R. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92
/*ref*/KECSKÉS, I. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001
/*ref*/KENDON, A. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572
/*ref*/KENDON, A. How Gestures Can Become Like Words. In: POYATOS, F. (org.). Cross Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. Toronto: Hogrefe, 1988. p. 131-141.
/*ref*/KOOLE, T.; THIJE, J. D. The Construction of Intercultural Discourse: Team Discussions of Educational Advisers. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994.
/*ref*/KÖVECSES, Z.; BENCZES, R. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
/*ref*/LADILOVA, A. Multimodale Analyse der interaktiven Aushandlung von Integration bei Brasilianer*innen in Deutschland. forthcoming.
/*ref*/MCNEILL, D. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
/*ref*/MCNEILL, D. Why We Gesture: The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316480526
/*ref*/MERLEAU-PONTY, M. The Primacy of Perception. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. 1964.
/*ref*/MEYER, C.; STREECK, J.; JORDAN, J. S. Introduction. In: ______. (org.). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. xv-xlix. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001
/*ref*/MÜLLER, C. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001
/*ref*/REDDY, M. J. The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language. In: ORTONY, A. (org.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. p. 284-324.
/*ref*/SCHEGLOFF, E. A. Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘uh huh’ and other Things that Come Between Sentences. In: TANNEN, D. (org.). Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1982. p. 71-93.
/*ref*/SCHEGLOFF, E. A. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
/*ref*/SCHÜTZ, A. The Stranger: an Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Psychology, Chicago, v. 49, n. 6, p. 499-507, 1944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219472
/*ref*/SELTING, M.; AUER, P.; BARTH-WEINGARTEN, D.; BERGMANN, J.; BERGMANN, P.; BIRKNER, K.; COUPER-KUHLEN, E.; DEPPERMANN, A.; GILLES, P.; GÜNTHNER, S.; HARTUNG, M.; KERN, F.; MERTZLUFFT, C.; MEYER, C.; MOREK, M.; OBERZAUCHER, F.; PETERS, J.; QUASTHOFF, U.; SCHÜTTE, W.; STUKENBROCK, A.; UHMANN, S. A System for Transcribing Talk-In-Interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, Göttinger, v. 12, p. 1-51, 2011.
/*ref*/STREECK, J. Gesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2
/*ref*/TANAKA, S. Intercorporeality as a Theory of Social Cognition. Theory & Psychology, [S.l.], v. 25, p. 455-472, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315583035
/*ref*/VERTOVEC, S. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 6, p. 1024-1054, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
/*ref*/WAGNER, P.; MALISZ, Z.; KOPP, S. Gesture and Speech in Interaction: An Overview. Speech Communication, [S.l.], v. 57, p. 209-232, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Anna Ladilova
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Anna Ladilova
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv


dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM; Vol 28, No 2 (2020): Metáfora e Multimodalidade; 917-955
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem; Vol 28, No 2 (2020): Metáfora e Multimodalidade; 917-955
2237-2083
0104-0588
reponame:Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online)
collection Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv relin.ufmg@gmail.com || periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com
_version_ 1853664376997806080
spelling Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality / Metaforas multimodais da interculturealidadeLinguística Teórica; Linguística Descritiva; Análise Linguísticametaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration; metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.Abstract: The present paper looks at the interactive construction of multimodal metaphors of interculturereality – a term coined by the author from interculturality and intercorporeality, assuming that intercultural interaction is always an embodied phenomenon, shared among its participants. For this, two videotaped sequences of a group conversation are analyzed drawing upon interaction analysis (Couper-Kuhlen; Selting, 2018). The data was transcribed following the GAT2 (Selting et al., 2011) guidelines, including gesture form annotation, which relied on the system described by Bressem (2013). Gesture function was interpreted drawing on the interactional context and on the system proposed by Kendon (2004) and Bressem and Müller (2013). The results question the validity of the classical conduit metaphor of communication (Reddy, 1979) in the intercultural context and instead propose an embodied approach to the conceptualization of the understanding process among the participants. The analysis also shows that even though the metaphors are multimodal, the metaphoric content is not always evenly distributed among the different modalities (speech, gesture). Apart from that, the metaphorical content is constructed sequentially, referring to preceding metaphors used by the same or different interlocutors and associated with metaphorical blends.Keywords: metaphors; multimodality; interculturality; intercorporeality; migration.Resumo: O presente artigo analisa a construção interativa de metáforas multimodais da interculturealidade – um termo proveniente da interculturalidade e intercorporealidade, assumindo que a interação intercultural é sempre um fenômeno incorporado, compartilhado entre os seus participantes. Para tal, duas sequências gravadas em vídeo de uma conversa em grupo serão analisadas com base na análise da interação (COUPER-KUHLEN; SELTING, 2018). Os dados foram transcritos seguindo as orientações do sistema GAT2 (SELTING et al., 2011), incluindo a anotação da forma gestual, que se baseou no sistema descrito por Bressem (2013). A função dos gestos foi interpretada com base no contexto interacional e no sistema proposto por Kendon (2004) e Bressem e Müller (2013). Os resultados questionam a validade da metáfora clássica do conduto de comunicação (REDDY, 2012) no contexto intercultural e, além disso, propõem uma abordagem corporificada da conceituação do processo de entendimento entre os participantes. A análise também mostra que, embora as metáforas sejam multimodais, o conteúdo metafórico não é sempre uniformemente distribuído entre as diferentes modalidades (fala, gesto). Além disso, o conteúdo metafórico é construído sequencialmente, referindo-se a metáforas anteriores utilizadas pelos mesmos ou diferentes interlocutores e recorrendo a mesclagens metafóricas.Palavras-chave: metáforas; multimodalidade; interculturalidade; intercorporealidade; migração.Faculdade de Letras2020-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/1634510.17851/2237-2083.28.2.917-955REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM; Vol 28, No 2 (2020): Metáfora e Multimodalidade; 917-955Revista de Estudos da Linguagem; Vol 28, No 2 (2020): Metáfora e Multimodalidade; 917-9552237-20830104-0588reponame:Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/16345/pdf/*ref*/ATTARDO, S. Humor and Laughter. In: TANNEN, D.; HAMILTON, H. E.; SCHIFFRIN, D. (org.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch8/*ref*/BARTH-WEINGARTEN, D.; REBER, E.; SELTING, M. (org.). Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23/*ref*/BOHNSACK, R.; NENTWIG-GESEMANN, I.; NOHL, A. M. Einleitung: Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. In: BOHNSACK, R.; NENTWIG-GESEMANN, I.; NOHL, A.-M. (org.). Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. 2. ed. Wiesbaden: VS, 2007. p. 9-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19895-8_1/*ref*/BRESSEM, J. A Linguistic Perspective on the Notation of Form Features in Gestures. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MCNEILL, D.; TAßENDORF, S. (org.). Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. p. 1079-1098./*ref*/BRESSEM, J.; MÜLLER, C. A Repertoire of German Recurrent Gestures with Pragmatic Functions. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S. H.; MCNEILL, D.; TAßENDORF, S. (org.). Body – Language – Communication. An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013. p. 1575-1591./*ref*/CIENKI, A. Why study metaphor and gesture? In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. p. 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3/*ref*/CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. Introduction. In: CIENKI, A.; MÜLLER, C. (org.). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. p. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.03cie/*ref*/COUPER-KUHLEN, E.; SELTING, M. (org.). Interacional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018./*ref*/FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. 1. ed. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2002./*ref*/FUCHS, T. Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity. In: MEYER, C.; STREECK, J.; JORDAN, J. S. (org.). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001/*ref*/GARDNER, R. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92/*ref*/KECSKÉS, I. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001/*ref*/KENDON, A. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572/*ref*/KENDON, A. How Gestures Can Become Like Words. In: POYATOS, F. (org.). Cross Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. Toronto: Hogrefe, 1988. p. 131-141./*ref*/KOOLE, T.; THIJE, J. D. The Construction of Intercultural Discourse: Team Discussions of Educational Advisers. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1994./*ref*/KÖVECSES, Z.; BENCZES, R. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010./*ref*/LADILOVA, A. Multimodale Analyse der interaktiven Aushandlung von Integration bei Brasilianer*innen in Deutschland. forthcoming./*ref*/MCNEILL, D. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992./*ref*/MCNEILL, D. Why We Gesture: The Surprising Role of Hand Movements in Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316480526/*ref*/MERLEAU-PONTY, M. The Primacy of Perception. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. 1964./*ref*/MEYER, C.; STREECK, J.; JORDAN, J. S. Introduction. In: ______. (org.). Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. xv-xlix. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001/*ref*/MÜLLER, C. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226548265.001.0001/*ref*/REDDY, M. J. The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language. In: ORTONY, A. (org.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. p. 284-324./*ref*/SCHEGLOFF, E. A. Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘uh huh’ and other Things that Come Between Sentences. In: TANNEN, D. (org.). Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1982. p. 71-93./*ref*/SCHEGLOFF, E. A. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208/*ref*/SCHÜTZ, A. The Stranger: an Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Psychology, Chicago, v. 49, n. 6, p. 499-507, 1944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/219472/*ref*/SELTING, M.; AUER, P.; BARTH-WEINGARTEN, D.; BERGMANN, J.; BERGMANN, P.; BIRKNER, K.; COUPER-KUHLEN, E.; DEPPERMANN, A.; GILLES, P.; GÜNTHNER, S.; HARTUNG, M.; KERN, F.; MERTZLUFFT, C.; MEYER, C.; MOREK, M.; OBERZAUCHER, F.; PETERS, J.; QUASTHOFF, U.; SCHÜTTE, W.; STUKENBROCK, A.; UHMANN, S. A System for Transcribing Talk-In-Interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, Göttinger, v. 12, p. 1-51, 2011./*ref*/STREECK, J. Gesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2/*ref*/TANAKA, S. Intercorporeality as a Theory of Social Cognition. Theory & Psychology, [S.l.], v. 25, p. 455-472, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315583035/*ref*/VERTOVEC, S. Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 6, p. 1024-1054, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465/*ref*/WAGNER, P.; MALISZ, Z.; KOPP, S. Gesture and Speech in Interaction: An Overview. Speech Communication, [S.l.], v. 57, p. 209-232, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008Copyright (c) 2020 Anna Ladilovainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLadilova, Anna2020-11-03T12:30:16Zoai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/16345Revistahttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/oaiPUBhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/oairelin.ufmg@gmail.com || periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com2237-20830104-0588opendoar:2020-11-03T12:30:16Revista de Estudos da Linguagem (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
score 15.198674

Registos relacionados