Teaching and assessment methods in preceptorship in health residencies: Cross-sectional study
Through a cross-sectional study, this study aimed to identify the teaching and evaluation methodologies used by health residency preceptors, in addition to associated factors, prior to a specialization course in multi-professional preceptorship. At the beginning of the course, between August and Sep...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) |
| Repositório: | Revista Temas em Educação e Saúde |
| Idioma: | português inglês |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/19113 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/tes/article/view/19113 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Preceptorship Internship and residency Internship, nonmedical Multiprofessional residency Preceptoría Internado y residência Residencia no médica no dental Residencia multiprofesional Preceptoria Internato e residência Residência não médica não odontológica Residência multiprofissional |
| Resumo: | Through a cross-sectional study, this study aimed to identify the teaching and evaluation methodologies used by health residency preceptors, in addition to associated factors, prior to a specialization course in multi-professional preceptorship. At the beginning of the course, between August and September 2022, 1112 preceptors from all regions of the country and levels of health care responded to an online questionnaire. The most used teaching and assessment methods are, respectively, case discussion (92.09%) and direct observation (78.69%). Preceptors who receive additional remuneration use more PBL and flipped classrooms, assessment in clinical practice environments, and 360° assessment. Assessment methods involving simulation and Mini-CEX are used by less than 10% of preceptors. Only 53.15% offer feedback on formal assessments. The variety and frequency of methodologies used, as well as feedback provision, must be considered when planning new preceptorship training. |
|---|