Batuques and toadas in discursive lineages: memory of elderly from arara and topic organization in a conversation
This study focuses on the interdependent relationship between language and memory, in which the speaking subject expresses its historicity in language practices. Therefore, it describes the interactive marks in the process of narrativization of memories in a conversation with elderly people. In this...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Associação Brasileira de Linguística (ABRALIN) |
| Repositorio: | Cadernos de Linguística |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs3.cadernos.abralin.org:article/496 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://cadernos.abralin.org/index.php/cadernos/article/view/496 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Conversação Marcadores discursivos Memória Relevo Tópico discursivo Conversation Discursive markers Discursive topic Memory Relief |
| Resumo: | This study focuses on the interdependent relationship between language and memory, in which the speaking subject expresses its historicity in language practices. Therefore, it describes the interactive marks in the process of narrativization of memories in a conversation with elderly people. In this context, the effects, notably, of discursive markers and relief in the topical construction of discourse are analyzed. The description and analysis are anchored in the perspective of Textual-Interactive Grammar (JUBRAN, 2015; KOCH, 2015), specifically, in the concepts of discursive topic (JUBRAN, 2015), relief (TRAVAGLIA, 2015) and discursive markers (RISSO, 2015; URBANO, 2015) in dialogue with socio-discursive and cognitive memory studies (COURTINE, 2006; PAVEAU, 2015; PAVEAU, 2007). Methodologically, a 17 minutes conversation between three elderly people from Arara community in Teixeira de Freitas (BA) is used as a corpus to highlight the discursive-pragmatic articulation between memory and narrative based on the multifunctionality of markers and relief resources. As a result, the metatextual functions are shown, mainly, of emotional relief, intonational reinforcement and deictics favoring the topical organization in a collaborative way, as well as the use of interactional discursive markers expressing attention, responsiveness and online processing of information, coming from memories evoked in sociocognitive memory. From Payer (2005) and Courtine (2006), the importance of the historical function of orality is highlighted and, with this, we seek to explain the role of memory in the organization of spoken discourse, since language and memory operate and they overlap in social relations and between historical subjects through pre-discourses in discursive lineages. |
|---|