On the Need / utility of Flexibilization Procedural by Judge of Procedure System in Brazil : An Analysis Required
This study addresses the phenomenon of procedural flexibility, one of the innovations provided for in the New Civil Procedure Code, introduced in Brazil by Law No. 13,105 /2015. The study begins with the presentation of models of procedural systems and their characteristics. Breaks, then to the stud...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
| Repositorio: | Revista de Processo, Jurisdição e Efetividade da Justiça |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/230 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistaprocessojurisdicao/article/view/230 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Procedural flexibility Procedural management Prerrogatives of the judge Law n . 13.105 / 2015 Flexibilização procedimental Gestão processual Poderes do juiz Lei n. 13.105/2015 |
| Resumo: | This study addresses the phenomenon of procedural flexibility, one of the innovations provided for in the New Civil Procedure Code, introduced in Brazil by Law No. 13,105 /2015. The study begins with the presentation of models of procedural systems and their characteristics. Breaks, then to the study of existing procedural flexibility models in other jurisdictions, with a special analysis of the main specificities of flexible models adopted by England, USA and Portugal. Then, it is the analysis of procedural flexibility by the judge in Brazil, from design first introduced in the House until the final version defined in Law No. 13,105 / 2015. Finally, we performed a critical analysis of the institute in view of the Civil Procedure Code 1973, the purpose of the institute to expedite the process in comparison with the issues that make the lengthy Brazilian legal system. The intent of this study, therefore, includes the design of procedural flexibility in foreign experience and national perspective. For this, we used the deductive-comparative method. |
|---|