Lógica condicional
The main goal of this work is to clarify the central concepts involved in the study of formalization of conditional sentences. More specifically, it has been done a comparative analysis of the two greater and more traditional proposals of conditional formalization (Lewis 1973c e Adams 1975). These p...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | master thesis |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Country: | Brasil |
| Institution: | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
| Repository: | Repositório Institucional da UFRN |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/16470 |
| Online Access: | https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/16470 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Lógica Condicional Filosofia da Lógica Filosofia da Linguagem Conditional Logic Philosophy of logic Philosophy of Language CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
| Summary: | The main goal of this work is to clarify the central concepts involved in the study of formalization of conditional sentences. More specifically, it has been done a comparative analysis of the two greater and more traditional proposals of conditional formalization (Lewis 1973c e Adams 1975). These proposals were responsible for the creation of a way of analysis that still present in the current debate about this subject. This work pursues to explain the principal assumptions held within these proposals. According to certain disambiguation techniques from Bennett (2003) and Lycan (2005), this work tries to explicit how these assumptions connect to the aims sought by the initial approaches. The following results show that there is a not declared presumption, the definition of the object of study of these theories, i.e., the definition of conditional sentence. This work argues that despite of not explicitly declared the definition of the study object has a central role in the intelligibility of the debate itself |
|---|