O dualismo grafite vs pichação : arte grafite, tagging, pichação e pixo
With this research, we have sought to explore the discursivity and historicity of Graffiti by means of the discursive genre known as tag, which is a kind of stylized signature, weaving a discourse analysis over the concrete enunciates found and collected as corpus throughout the region of Grande Vit...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES) |
| Repositorio: | Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/3789 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/3789 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pichação Tag Ideologia História Pixo Graffiti Discourse Ideology History Grafite Letramento Análise do discurso Linguística 80 |
| Sumario: | With this research, we have sought to explore the discursivity and historicity of Graffiti by means of the discursive genre known as tag, which is a kind of stylized signature, weaving a discourse analysis over the concrete enunciates found and collected as corpus throughout the region of Grande Vitoria – ES. This procedure has been brought forth with the purpose of understanding how Brazilian society has comprised the dicotomy “Grafite/Pichação” within its discursive formation. Key-words of Discourse Analysis (DA) such as ideology, subject, history and discursive memory have served us as theoretical support, as well as to compare it with a previous analysis about the ocupation-invation opposition. The relation of the tag genre with the concepts that were mentioned above - which took place along with the field research (interviews and gathering of textual material with the local graffiti scene) - have allowed us to discern how a discursive analysis differs from the common sense built around such a dicotomy, which materializes on the enunciation plan a conflict that exists on the ideological plan. Summarily, as we put through the lens of analysis a historical and discursive point of view about the subject, we have exposed the perspective from certain social movements that have graffiti-tagging as a practice, disagreeing from such an opposition between those two terms. |
|---|