Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany

This article aims to describe and analyze the contents of the legal discourses of magistrates in Brazil and Germany in the light of José Rodrigo Rodriguez's theory of hermeneutic subjectivism. It starts with a descriptive study of the constitutional provisions in force in Brazil and Germany, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Souto Brandao Pereira, Rebeka, Martins, Leonardo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Institución:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
Repositorio:Juris (Rio Grande. Online)
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.periodicos.furg.br:article/15416
Acceso en línea:https://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/15416
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Legitimidade argumentativa
Decisão judicial
Constituição
Argumentative legitimacy
Judicial decision
Constitution
id BR_3a78cd1cd6fa0f2403f8abc28c847665
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.furg.br:article/15416
network_acronym_str BR
network_name_str Brasil
repository_id_str
spelling Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and GermanyMatriz de análise das decisões judiciais: o discurso dos magistrados no Brasil e AlemanhaLegitimidade argumentativaDecisão judicialConstituiçãoDecisão judicial Argumentative legitimacy Judicial decision ConstitutionJudicial decision This article aims to describe and analyze the contents of the legal discourses of magistrates in Brazil and Germany in the light of José Rodrigo Rodriguez's theory of hermeneutic subjectivism. It starts with a descriptive study of the constitutional provisions in force in Brazil and Germany, in order to explain the respective constitutional structures and their implications in the construction of the legal argumentation of the decision in order to debate the decision “Brazilian style” and “German style”. To this end, an exploratory methodology was applied and bibliographic and documentary research was chosen as an instrument for studying interdisciplinary scientific works, using especially the analysis of decisions rendered in Brazil and Germany, in addition to proposing a matrix for objective content analysis. The results obtained did not establish a value judgment on the Constitutional Courts of the two countries, on the contrary, they provided an expanded view of their practices, insofar as they pointed out distinctions in the way of exposing the content of the respective speeches, demonstrating that cultural differences demarcate the judges, from their training to their professional performance.O presente artigo objetiva descrever e analisar os conteúdos dos discursos jurídicos dos magistrados no Brasil e na Alemanha à luz da teoria do subjetivismo hermenêutico de José Rodrigo Rodriguez. Partindo-se de um estudo descritivo dos dispositivos constitucionais vigentes no Brasil e na Alemanha, a fim de se explicitar as respectivas estruturas constitucionais e suas implicações na construção da argumentação jurídica da decisão de modo a debater a decisão “à moda brasileira” e “à moda germânica”. Para tanto, aplicou-se a metodologia do tipo exploratória e elegeu-se a pesquisa bibliográfica e documental como instrumento de estudos de trabalhos científicos interdisciplinares, valendo-se especialmente da análise das decisões proferidas no Brasil e na Alemanha, além de propor uma matriz para análise objetiva de conteúdo. Os resultados obtidos não estabeleceram juízo de valor sobre os Tribunais Constitucionais dos dois países, ao contrário, propiciaram uma visão ampliada sobre suas práticas, na medida em que apontaram distinções na maneira de expor o conteúdo dos respectivos discursos, demonstrando que as diferenças culturais demarcam os julgadores, desde a sua formação até a sua atuação profissional.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande2023-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigos avaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/1541610.14295/juris.v32i1.15416JURIS - Faculty of Law Journal; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022); 71 - 92JURIS - Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2022); 71 - 92JURIS - Revista da Faculdade de Direito; v. 32 n. 1 (2022); 71 - 922447-38551413-3571reponame:Juris (Rio Grande. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)instacron:FURGporhttps://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/15416/10531https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouto Brandao Pereira, RebekaMartins, Leonardo2024-02-06T14:49:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.furg.br:article/15416Revistahttp://www.seer.furg.br/juris/indexPUBhttps://seer.furg.br/juris/oaijrcc.pel@gmail.com||revistajuris.furg@gmail.com||juris@furg.br2447-38551413-3571opendoar:2024-02-06T14:49:52Juris (Rio Grande. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
Matriz de análise das decisões judiciais: o discurso dos magistrados no Brasil e Alemanha
title Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
spellingShingle Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
Souto Brandao Pereira, Rebeka
Legitimidade argumentativa
Decisão judicial
Constituição
Decisão judicial
Argumentative legitimacy
Judicial decision
Constitution
Judicial decision
title_short Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
title_full Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
title_fullStr Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
title_full_unstemmed Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
title_sort Matrix of analysis of court decisions: the speech of magistrates in Brazil and Germany
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Souto Brandao Pereira, Rebeka
Martins, Leonardo
author Souto Brandao Pereira, Rebeka
author_facet Souto Brandao Pereira, Rebeka
Martins, Leonardo
author_role author
author2 Martins, Leonardo
author2_role author
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Legitimidade argumentativa
Decisão judicial
Constituição
Decisão judicial
Argumentative legitimacy
Judicial decision
Constitution
Judicial decision
topic Legitimidade argumentativa
Decisão judicial
Constituição
Decisão judicial
Argumentative legitimacy
Judicial decision
Constitution
Judicial decision
description This article aims to describe and analyze the contents of the legal discourses of magistrates in Brazil and Germany in the light of José Rodrigo Rodriguez's theory of hermeneutic subjectivism. It starts with a descriptive study of the constitutional provisions in force in Brazil and Germany, in order to explain the respective constitutional structures and their implications in the construction of the legal argumentation of the decision in order to debate the decision “Brazilian style” and “German style”. To this end, an exploratory methodology was applied and bibliographic and documentary research was chosen as an instrument for studying interdisciplinary scientific works, using especially the analysis of decisions rendered in Brazil and Germany, in addition to proposing a matrix for objective content analysis. The results obtained did not establish a value judgment on the Constitutional Courts of the two countries, on the contrary, they provided an expanded view of their practices, insofar as they pointed out distinctions in the way of exposing the content of the respective speeches, demonstrating that cultural differences demarcate the judges, from their training to their professional performance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigos avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/15416
10.14295/juris.v32i1.15416
url https://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/15416
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/juris.v32i1.15416
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.furg.br/juris/article/view/15416/10531
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv JURIS - Faculty of Law Journal; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022); 71 - 92
JURIS - Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2022); 71 - 92
JURIS - Revista da Faculdade de Direito; v. 32 n. 1 (2022); 71 - 92
2447-3855
1413-3571
reponame:Juris (Rio Grande. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron:FURG
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
instacron_str FURG
institution FURG
reponame_str Juris (Rio Grande. Online)
collection Juris (Rio Grande. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Juris (Rio Grande. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jrcc.pel@gmail.com||revistajuris.furg@gmail.com||juris@furg.br
_version_ 1853661101912227840
score 15.198674