THE AUTONOMY OF UNCONSCIOUS SYMBOLISM AND EXPRESSIVITY IN DREAMS ACCORDING TO MERLEAU-PONTY
This article deals with a study on how Merleau-Pontyseeks to extract, from Freud’s theory of dreams, ontological consequences concerning the expressive link between the different dimensions of the dreamexperience, specifically on the role of daytime remains in the discharge of libido, in realization...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Recursos: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| Repositório: | Kriterion (Online) |
| Idioma: | português |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/25798 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25798 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Sonho Freud Expressão Merleau-Ponty Dream Expression |
| Resumo: | This article deals with a study on how Merleau-Pontyseeks to extract, from Freud’s theory of dreams, ontological consequences concerning the expressive link between the different dimensions of the dreamexperience, specifically on the role of daytime remains in the discharge of libido, in realization of symbolism or, what is the same thing, in the conversion of symbolism into something narrative and sensitive, specifically affective. As it will be shown, for Merleau-Ponty, whether in the dreamed dream or in the reported dream, we can verify between the imaginary dimension (affectiveand narrative) introduced by the daytime remains, on the one hand; and the symbolic (or unconscious) dimension expressed as a forgotten signifier, on theother; a sort of unity without coincidence, a merely expressive indivisibility.The question of this article is - from an ontological point of view - how does the expressive division between the dreamed and the reported dispense therecourse to the idea of a transparent interiority? |
|---|