Why is not conversation the soul of democracy?
Inspired by the writings of John Dewey, among others, communication studies have taken face-to-face conversation to be at the heart of democratic life. But face-to-face conversation has been much more honored in aristocracies than in democracies; and there are, in fact, two distinctive and contrasti...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
| Repositorio: | Revista FAMECOS: Mídia cultura e tecnologia |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/3096 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/revistafamecos/article/view/3096 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dialogue Public Sphere Argumentation Political conversation Comunicação conversação democracia Conversação política |
| Sumario: | Inspired by the writings of John Dewey, among others, communication studies have taken face-to-face conversation to be at the heart of democratic life. But face-to-face conversation has been much more honored in aristocracies than in democracies; and there are, in fact, two distinctive and contrasting ideals of conversation: the social conversation and the problem-solving conversation. |
|---|