Conceptions and exercise of autonomy among indigenous and peasant movements in Latin America
In this paper we present a categorization of autonomies implemented by indigenous and peasant movements in Latin America into three types: a) juridical versus de facto autonomies; b) explicit versus implicit autonomies; and c) (mono)ethnic versus popular or class-based autonomies. We argue that the...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| Repositorio: | Revista NERA |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revista.fct.unesp.br:article/9944 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revista.fct.unesp.br/index.php/nera/article/view/9944 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Autonomia Movimentos Sociais Campesinato Povos Indígenas América Latina Autonomy Social movements ; Peasantry Indigenous Peoples Latin America Autonomía Movimientos sociales Campesinado Pueblos Indígenas |
| Sumario: | In this paper we present a categorization of autonomies implemented by indigenous and peasant movements in Latin America into three types: a) juridical versus de facto autonomies; b) explicit versus implicit autonomies; and c) (mono)ethnic versus popular or class-based autonomies. We argue that the debate concerning these different conceptions is of strategic importance both in the dialogue between indigenous and peasant struggles for the defense of territories, and in the question of peasant autonomy, understood as a strategy of struggle. |
|---|