Awaiting accurate scientific evidence: Progression or “profiles” in bipolar disorder?
This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential meth- odological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Argentina |
| Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| Repositorio: | CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/47864 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/47864 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Bipolar Disorder Response to Treatment Staging Neuroprogression https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
| Sumario: | This letter is written in response to a review recently published in the journal. The aim is to highlight a potential meth- odological limitation common to many studies comparing bipolar patients with few previous episodes versus those with multiple episodes, and in which the results are interpreted as indicating the longitudinal course of the illness. |
|---|