The advisory opinion of the Interamerican Court in the conventionality control
This article discusses the conventionality control according to the jurisprudence of the interamerican Court of Human rights. Particularly, the author analyzes whether advisory opinions, like judgments, constitute the “controlling material” of the conventionality control. in this way, the author pre...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14822 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/14822 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Advisory opinion Interamerican Court of Human Rights Conventionality control international Law Constitutional Law Opinión consultiva Corte interamericana de Derechos Humanos Control de convencionalidad Derecho internacional Derecho Constitucional |
| Sumario: | This article discusses the conventionality control according to the jurisprudence of the interamerican Court of Human rights. Particularly, the author analyzes whether advisory opinions, like judgments, constitute the “controlling material” of the conventionality control. in this way, the author presents and discusses theses derived from the referred jurisprudence, to conclude that the interpretative guidelines contained in advisory opinions of the interamerican Court of Human rights constitute the “controlling material” under certain circumstances. |
|---|