Nominalized clauses, clausal arguments and agreement
Strict minimalist assumptions require adopting the hypothesis that argument clauses and nominalized clauses are assigned Phi features. The data examined suggest that the interpretable Phi content of these arguments is specified as [-P, -N, -G]. We conclude that all arguments (of the clausal or of th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2001 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:2233 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/2233 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Phi features Clauses Nominalized clauses Agreement Trets Phi Oracions Oracions nominalitzades Concordança |
| Resumo: | Strict minimalist assumptions require adopting the hypothesis that argument clauses and nominalized clauses are assigned Phi features. The data examined suggest that the interpretable Phi content of these arguments is specified as [-P, -N, -G]. We conclude that all arguments (of the clausal or of the nominal types) are subject to the operation Agree with a functional category. All arguments behave alike as far as abstract computational operations is concerned. The computational component is blind to the concrete values of the features of the arguments related to functional categories. |
|---|