Is Pain Metaphysically Evil (Malum Simpliciter)? Some Thoughts from a Thomistic Perspective

Contrary to the commonly assumed opinion that Christianity sees pain as intrinsically evil – where evil is defined as the lack of something good – Aquinas defines pain not as a privation but rather a passion of the soul, i.e., an emotion that depends on sensual and/or intellective cognition of somet...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Tabaczek, M (Mariusz)|||/items/2affbe51-b999-4f76-bddd-ede951b2497b
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/69917
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/69917
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:appetite
emotion
evil
pain
passion
suffering
theodicy
Descrição
Resumo:Contrary to the commonly assumed opinion that Christianity sees pain as intrinsically evil – where evil is defined as the lack of something good – Aquinas defines pain not as a privation but rather a passion of the soul, i.e., an emotion that depends on sensual and/or intellective cognition of something evil, is good in itself, and may serve a purpose. This article offers a formalized version of the Thomistic definition of pain and related negative (unpleasant) emotions experienced by humans. It also compares and contrasts this view with some contemporary scientific and philosophical models of pain.